Bilburt Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 Just now, OldKeith said: If I was host, I would definitely enforce the 48 hour rule. Kevola clearly showed initiative in starting the conversation, even if he did not provide times. It's a delicate situation, if it's set in stone, so be it, but I disagree with the ruling. I agree with you on every point you made, and I myself do think that kevin should have gotten the activity win, but I was just trying to point out where zebra was coming from Link to comment
BlackJovi Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 This basically happened because Doc is in the team with Kevola Erayne, DoctorPBC and Bilburt 3 Link to comment
kevola Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 1 minute ago, Bilburt said: I think the main thing is that Kevola didnt provide any times himself, and while I feel that kevin was the more active one, I can see why zebra didnt find it enough Thing is man, he didn't check his pm till Friday, so even if I had given a time he wouldn't have seen it. A conversation requires two people. I was also very flexible with when I could play so I was asking him for his preferance Link to comment
Bilburt Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 Just now, kevola said: Thing is man, he didn't check his pm till Friday, so even if I had given a time he wouldn't have seen it. A conversation requires two people. I was also very flexible with when I could play so I was asking him for his preferance 1 minute ago, Bilburt said: I agree with you on every point you made, and I myself do think that kevin should have gotten the activity win, but I was just trying to point out where zebra was coming from Link to comment
BurntZebra Posted June 20, 2017 Author Share Posted June 20, 2017 The decision I made is final. This thread may be locked now, @TheChampionMike. Link to comment
OldKeith Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 2 minutes ago, kevola said: Thing is man, he didn't check his pm till Friday, so even if I had given a time he wouldn't have seen it. A conversation requires two people. I was also very flexible with when I could play so I was asking him for his preferance This makes the whole difference to you getting the win. Link to comment
kevola Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 (edited) 4 minutes ago, BurntZebra said: The decision I made is final. This thread may be locked now, @TheChampionMike. It's brilliant how you can't give a proper response when all your points have been addressed Edit : If the decision is final at least continue by showing why my points are wrong Edited June 20, 2017 by kevola Link to comment
kevola Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 1 minute ago, OldKeith said: This makes the whole difference to you getting the win. His response was basically saying why he was busy He told me on mail in game that he was free on wednesday (No time given) Waited all day, he never came online, or at least I didn't catch him online (And I was on a lot that day) Link to comment
Bilburt Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 3 minutes ago, kevola said: It's brilliant how you can't give a proper response when all your points have been addressed Edit : If the decision is final at least continue by showing why my points are wrong I mean hes not obligated at all to explain his reasoning, when you decided to join you accepted the fact that this could and would happen its unfortunate but you can't change anything about Link to comment
kevola Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 Just now, Bilburt said: I mean hes not obligated at all to explain his reasoning, when you decided to join you accepted the fact that this could and would happen its unfortunate but you can't change anything about He's not obliged to do anything, you're right. However, if he doesn't give a proper explanation, people can abuse the shit out this, I sure as hell know I will. Zymogen 1 Link to comment
Bilburt Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 Just now, kevola said: He's not obliged to do anything, you're right. However, if he doesn't give a proper explanation, people can abuse the shit out this, I sure as hell know I will. I mean what they gonna abuse, his word will always be final, looks at last psl. A lot of people didnt agree with JJ's reasoning but psl still continued. the only thing happend was that JJ and gb became best of friends Link to comment
BurntZebra Posted June 20, 2017 Author Share Posted June 20, 2017 2 minutes ago, kevola said: He's not obliged to do anything, you're right. However, if he doesn't give a proper explanation, people can abuse the shit out this, I sure as hell know I will. If only you put this much dedication into actually getting your match played, instead of bickering after the fact. Link to comment
kevola Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 Just now, BurntZebra said: If only you put this much dedication into actually getting your match played, instead of bickering after the fact. If only you could understand how much effort I actually put into trying to get the match done instead of being ignorant, you might be able to make a more informed decision. This or you're just afraid on going back on a decision Also, it's funny how you respond to this rather than responding to the merits of my argument which probably means you either agree with me or can't find a way to dispute it Erayne, RysPicz, Zymogen and 1 other 4 Link to comment
Recommended Posts