Raederz Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 (edited) Bla bla bla, I'll show you a pic as an exemple cuz I'm lazy to explain, then i'll list pro/cons. If you still dont get it, the point is to create a 3rd color, to have the gifts shinies and caught shinies differencied. See pro/cons for "why". Pro : New color is cool. Make different rewards for different achievements (shiny hunting and winning tournaments are not same skill) Stop all those value problem, that unallow staff to gift some pokemon. -> Comp Gifts may be gifted regarding the tier, the usage, and not the "encounter rate" or the "ingame $ value". -> Recently rare shiny gifted dont affect the tradeable shinies value anymore. Shiny Hunting now makes sense. Cons : May be hard to code ? Idk ? Some work on making the new colors at the start. May offend pvp players who prefer original shiny ? Tell me if you see more. ________ Well, the most important is to break the value relation between gifts and caught shinies. This is good for the caught shinies, having more stable value. This is also good for the gifts, being able to be gifted regarding usage and not non-gift value. Edited February 15, 2017 by Raederz BigPapi, JLxKaos, aftershocker and 6 others 9 Link to comment
0 Raederz Posted February 15, 2017 Author Share Posted February 15, 2017 30 minutes ago, Cameron said: This idea is absolutely terrible and is by far the worst suggestion I have ever read. I don't wanna run around seeing nonsensical colored pokes and pooped hackmons, thanks. Oooh I see Link to comment
0 Bluebird Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 This is one step away of implementing fake pokemons, and shiny hunters would start asking for special shinies too. Quote Can I get a Jumpeon with flames if I encounter one million eevees? Link to comment
0 OrangeManiac Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 I can see why someone could feel as if the current prize system does not work but implementing non-canon 3rd color pattern Pokemon just for lols doesn't really help to make people take this game seriously at all. Link to comment
0 Raederz Posted February 15, 2017 Author Share Posted February 15, 2017 Well, I see that the 3rd color is too "fake" to be accepted, but still, as Orange just said, I really think the current gifting system is too restricting. Link to comment
0 Flavawhat Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 vanities is the way to go Bluebird, MirandaKun, WestTurtle and 1 other 4 Link to comment
0 MirandaKun Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 1 hour ago, Flavawhat said: vanities is the way to go Thread Link to comment
0 skyjuju Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 it's look like some bad pokemon browser game xD Spoiler I think is a good idea Spoiler or not! Link to comment
0 FuzzyRegirock Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 @Raederz you should enter the forum drawing contests tbh WestTurtle, Startear, Toupi and 1 other 4 Link to comment
Question
Raederz
Bla bla bla, I'll show you a pic as an exemple cuz I'm lazy to explain, then i'll list pro/cons.
If you still dont get it, the point is to create a 3rd color, to have the gifts shinies and caught shinies differencied.
See pro/cons for "why".
Pro :
New color is cool.
Make different rewards for different achievements (shiny hunting and winning tournaments are not same skill)
Stop all those value problem, that unallow staff to gift some pokemon.
-> Comp Gifts may be gifted regarding the tier, the usage, and not the "encounter rate" or the "ingame $ value".
-> Recently rare shiny gifted dont affect the tradeable shinies value anymore.
Shiny Hunting now makes sense.
Cons :
May be hard to code ? Idk ?
Some work on making the new colors at the start.
May offend pvp players who prefer original shiny ?
Tell me if you see more.
________
Well, the most important is to break the value relation between gifts and caught shinies.
This is good for the caught shinies, having more stable value.
This is also good for the gifts, being able to be gifted regarding usage and not non-gift value.
Edited by RaederzLink to comment
33 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now