pachima Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 (edited) 33 minutes ago, Spaintakula said: Just use focus energy machamp for curselax hm.... now that I think of it Edited November 8, 2016 by pachima Kiing. Link to comment
soyhector Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 On 5/10/2016 at 5:57 PM, RysPicz said: A Tasty Cep Semi- Finals: LifeStyle vs SoyHector What are you talking about? O.o Link to comment
Draekyn Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 I bet anti-lax ppl voted Trump OrangeManiac 1 Link to comment
Torinnnnn Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 11 minutes ago, Draekyn said: I bet anti-lax ppl voted Trump true Link to comment
Rendiz Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 1 hour ago, Draekyn said: I bet anti-lax ppl voted Trump Snorlax is a wall. Trump likes walls. anti-lax people = anti-wall Therefor the anti-lax people voted Hillary. xXBlu3BreathXx, OrangeManiac, LuisPocho and 4 others 7 Link to comment
epicdavenport Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 13 minutes ago, Rendiz said: Snorlax is a wall. Trump likes walls. anti-lax people = anti-wall Therefor the anti-lax people voted Hillary. Na Link to comment
Tyrone Posted November 9, 2016 Author Share Posted November 9, 2016 Snorlax is test banned to verify whether or not its presence in OU has an unhealthy impact on the metagame: The TC expects that, by removing Snorlax from OU, the tier will open up as we will see more diversity than before. The TC wants a creative OU environment where the meta evolves and where players are not restricted to play generic cores. The TC expects to see a more evenly spread usage table where we see less pokemon with 25%+ usage and more pokemon with 15%+ usage. The TC expects to see less uncompetitive strategies. The TC expects that, if Chansey’s usage sky rockets, players will be able to handle this blob in a swiftly fashion. The TC expects that an increase in cleric’s viability will not automatically make offense and balance play styles any less viable. Snorlax is quite centralising to a problematic extant; OU players bring several checks to handle Snorlax and sometimes this is still not enough. The momentum loss from a Body Slam paralysis proc is usually irrecoverable - especially since Snorlax punishes severely the use of Clerics. CurseLax' sweeping potential requires very specific answers that Snorlax can surprise with its versatile moveset possibilities. Pursuit Lax is a nightmare for a most special attackers in OU. It is very evident that playing Snorlax increases a player's win condition considerably - and arguably to a very unhealthy point where there is hardly any winning scenario for a Laxless team facing a Snorlax. The test ban will take one month. After this month, depending on the meta adjustements, the Tier Council will decide whether or not Snorlax remains banned or not. The TC - as well as many of you - wants a final decision on Snorlax as soon as possible, so let's really focus in on this test and determine once and for all whether this thing belongs in our OU meta. You may discuss this in this thread: Maelstrom, DrButler, Blue and 12 others 15 Link to comment
Recommended Posts