semjon Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 My suggestion is, to remove the not not (relevant) full evolved pokémon from the NU tier in pokedex. Whenever i want to check if my NUs are still NU its very annoying to watch through bulbasaur/ivysaur, charmander/charmeleon etc. ShadowGary, aftershocker, SirAlbert and 8 others 11 Link to comment
0 ZorNiFieD Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 Someone might use these "irrelevant" pokemon though JonesMX 1 Link to comment
0 BlackJovi Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 Someone might use these "irrelevant" pokemon though true, metapod + pidgey etc are definitely comp Bilburt, ShadowGary and razimove 3 Link to comment
0 ZorNiFieD Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 true, metapod + pidgey etc are definitely comp perfect core Link to comment
0 Champlooo Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 Maybe they could put a low bound for NU, make it like 1%. Anything with usage under that goes to another category. "Other" maybe, unless they wanna add PU and all that shit. Havsha 1 Link to comment
0 Havsha Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 Maybe they could put a low bound for NU, make it like 1%. Anything with usage under that goes to another category. "Other" maybe, unless they wanna add PU and all that shit. aftershocker and BlackJovi 2 Link to comment
0 Champlooo Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 Maybe they could put a low bound for NU, make it like 1%. Anything with usage under that goes to another category. "Other" maybe, unless they wanna add PU and all that shit. LF PU Viability Thread They might add RU though. I remember reading somewhere that if they add another tier, RU should be the current NU, and NU will be the lower tier. Idk why they didn't just name what we have now RU in the first place Link to comment
0 BigShotJoe Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 They might add RU though. I remember reading somewhere that if they add another tier, RU should be the current NU, and NU will be the lower tier. Idk why they didn't just name what we have now RU in the first place Probably because all the Pokemon in that tier are literally never used. I don't think I've ever seen an NU Pokemon on a serious OU team. Link to comment
0 Champlooo Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 Probably because all the Pokemon in that tier are literally never used. I don't think I've ever seen an NU Pokemon on a serious OU team. LF Benjaminvoz Link to comment
0 BigShotJoe Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 LF Benjaminvoz Probably because all the Pokemon in that tier are literally never used. I don't think I've ever seen an NU Pokemon on a serious OU team. Link to comment
0 Champlooo Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 Probably because all the Pokemon in that tier are literally never used. I don't think I've ever seen an NU Pokemon on a ((((serious OU team.)))) LF Benjaminvoz BlackJovi 1 Link to comment
0 ReDellaStrada47 Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 Someone might use these "irrelevant" pokemon though Irrevelant, I think. 99% of those pokemons are obviously NU: all not-full-evolved are NU. We can remove them from NU in the Pokedex, it's tacit that they are NU. Link to comment
0 Gunthug Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 Probably because all the Pokemon in that tier are literally never used. I don't think I've ever seen an NU Pokemon on a serious OU team. Lol this is just flat out wrong. It was named NU and not RU because we don't really have enough Pokemon to justify an RU tier. So we stuck with gen 3's tier names - they only had OU UU and NU Arimanius and Champlooo 2 Link to comment
0 axx Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 (edited) NU shouldn't even be a thing there, what is implemented in the dex are ban-lists to know if your pokemon is still NU then check all the higher ban-lists To add to this point: I would rather see the tiers implemented instead of the ban-lists, that way when you select "Ubers" it would be like the current "All Tiers", if you select "OU" it would show all of the pokemon but those banned to Ubers, and so on. However this is far from what you want in the OP (for that they would need to implement PU and then you can have a NU ban-list ;v). Edited April 18, 2016 by axx Link to comment
0 semjon Posted April 18, 2016 Author Share Posted April 18, 2016 NU shouldn't even be a thing there, what is implemented in the dex are ban-lists to know if your pokemon is still NU then check all the higher ban-lists mrsuperclever hmm? Link to comment
0 BurntZebra Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 NU shouldn't even be a thing there, what is implemented in the dex are ban-lists to know if your pokemon is still NU then check all the higher ban-lists To add to this point: I would rather see the tiers implemented instead of the ban-lists, that way when you select "Ubers" it would be like the current "All Tiers", if you select "OU" it would show all of the pokemon but those banned to Ubers, and so on. However this is far from what you want in the OP (for that they would need to implement PU and then you can have a NU ban-list ;v). I think you're a bit confused on what tiers are. Tiers are playable and have a certain set of viable pokemon within them. You might be thinking of BL and BL2, which are banlists for UU and NU respectively. NU is most definitely a tier, just like UU and OU, as evident of its existence in team tournament and official matchmaking. One of the simple basics of tiers is that you can always run lower tier pokemon in a higher tier, but not vice versa. It's not really necessary to include every pokemon that can be used in ubers, because they also belong to different tiers. It's not really accurate to say metapod is OU, as surprisingly enough, it never gets usage in OU, UU, or NU. By definition, OU is overused. Ubers is the ban list for OU. Even though you can run metapod in ubers, it has never and will never be banned from OU, so labeling it under the uber category in addition to OU, UU, and NU is very misleading. ReDellaStrada47 1 Link to comment
0 axx Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 You might be thinking of BL and BL2, which are banlists for UU and NU respectively. yeah, forgot you use those here Link to comment
0 ZaoLi Posted April 19, 2016 Share Posted April 19, 2016 bro just check the UU's for ur NU pokes lol. or even OU sometimes :P Link to comment
0 chuur Posted October 8, 2016 Share Posted October 8, 2016 On 4/18/2016 at 6:34 AM, semjon said: My suggestion is, to remove the not not (relevant) full evolved pokémon from the NU tier in pokedex. Whenever i want to check if my NUs are still NU its very annoying to watch through bulbasaur/ivysaur, charmander/charmeleon etc. i second this motion make a really never never ever use, so NU is easier to look at without all the junk pre-evos semjon 1 Link to comment
Question
semjon
My suggestion is, to remove the not not (relevant) full evolved pokémon from the NU tier in pokedex. Whenever i want to check if my NUs are still NU its very annoying to watch through bulbasaur/ivysaur, charmander/charmeleon etc.
Link to comment
19 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now