hitmanxROCKS Posted August 31, 2013 Share Posted August 31, 2013 I will be very creative :D Link to comment
Inarin Posted August 31, 2013 Share Posted August 31, 2013 Pokemon: Frosslass, Flareon, Dragonair, Murkrow, Manectric, Cacturne Text: Rin :) I look forward to the results! Link to comment
hitmanxROCKS Posted August 31, 2013 Author Share Posted August 31, 2013 these is an signature [img]http://www.onlinesignature.in/im/31-08-13/1890368733223407310813.png[/img] or this[img]http://www.onlinesignature.in/im/31-08-13/1975249878063507310813.png[/img] but [color=rgb(40,40,40)][font=helvetica] Frosslass, Flareon, Dragonair, Murkrow, Manectric, Cacturne[/font][/color] is impossible for me Link to comment
hitmanxROCKS Posted August 31, 2013 Author Share Posted August 31, 2013 Xenocider if you like this im happy :) Link to comment
Inarin Posted August 31, 2013 Share Posted August 31, 2013 but Frosslass, Flareon, Dragonair, Murkrow, Manectric, Cacturne is impossible for me Misunderstood, apologies :) Link to comment
Bimps1002 Posted August 31, 2013 Share Posted August 31, 2013 omfg hitmanx retunrs four anthr grate signatrue thred Link to comment
Rache Posted September 1, 2013 Share Posted September 1, 2013 The generally accepted definition of a signature on the internet is a combination of text and graphics that is attached to the end of a user's post. Downloading a font and typing a name on an image little over 50 pixels in width isn't a signature (and it's not exactly "creative" either). Basically, the title is misleading. "REAL" also implies quality - something that takes more than a minute and a fancy font. Moving on, these "signatures" are rather pointless. In order to actually use it on anything, it would have to be painstakingly cut out, and because they're absolutely tiny it would have to be almost pixel by pixel. It would be far, far easier for someone planning on using something like this to simply download the font and type it themselves. Let's take the "signature" on this artwork as an example. The words are applied directly onto the image - no white box around them and no need for cutting it out. Most of all though, it's 60p and even then it's relatively small. A 43x22 image done in a font between 14p and 18p is just far too small to be of use for anything. Even if you were doing them in 60p, it's still small on my artwork above which was done at 2000x1700 (reduced for this post). That's not as big as it sounds. A signature is always the last thing added to a piece anyway. Before you start doing the same thing but bigger though, it really doesn't take much - if any - creativity to download a font from a site like Dafont then write a person's name. If you did these by hand with a graphics tablet it would be different, but you're using a font, which requires zero effort. You say that you will be "very creative" but have yet to prove it. The signature below would be much better received as it's something that was written and drawn from scratch. Although it's lacking in quality as I spent all of about two minutes on it, it does at least show effort and is the sort of thing that would be at least somewhat appreciated. People troll almost every thread in some way, but these signature threads you've been making are drawing them in like bees to honey. I know I've been rather blunt about it all, but I'm not trying to be offensive. This is my advice; if you want people to take your creations seriously, they have to show effort. Not counting the time it takes to download the fonts, the "signatures" on this thread would have taken less than a minute each to make. The same thing goes for your previous thread; slapping official Sugimori artwork onto a black or white background with a name shows no effort either. These things attract attention, but none of it is positive. If you step up your game and truly create something, people will appreciate it and perhaps even admire it. If you take these words to heart, you'll find yourself improving instead of being a target of trolls. XKisameX, Evesa, Oldinstagram and 1 other 4 Link to comment
TorCharDrawings Posted September 1, 2013 Share Posted September 1, 2013 pls one for me thx if you can just like rachel a cubone head kthx Link to comment
Bimps1002 Posted September 1, 2013 Share Posted September 1, 2013 The generally accepted definition of a signature on the internet is a combination of text and graphics that is attached to the end of a user's post. Downloading a font and typing a name on an image little over 50 pixels in width isn't a signature (and it's not exactly "creative" either). Basically, the title is misleading. "REAL" also implies quality - something that takes more than a minute and a fancy font. Moving on, these "signatures" are rather pointless. In order to actually use it on anything, it would have to be painstakingly cut out, and because they're absolutely tiny it would have to be almost pixel by pixel. It would be far, far easier for someone planning on using something like this to simply download the font and type it themselves. Let's take the "signature" on this artwork as an example. The words are applied directly onto the image - no white box around them and no need for cutting it out. Most of all though, it's 60p and even then it's relatively small. A 43x22 image done in a font between 14p and 18p is just far too small to be of use for anything. Even if you were doing them in 60p, it's still small on my artwork above which was done at 2000x1700 (reduced for this post). That's not as big as it sounds. A signature is always the last thing added to a piece anyway. Before you start doing the same thing but bigger though, it really doesn't take much - if any - creativity to download a font from a site like Dafont then write a person's name. If you did these by hand with a graphics tablet it would be different, but you're using a font, which requires zero effort. You say that you will be "very creative" but have yet to prove it. The signature below would be much better received as it's something that was written and drawn from scratch. Although it's lacking in quality as I spent all of about two minutes on it, it does at least show effort and is the sort of thing that would be at least somewhat appreciated. People troll almost every thread in some way, but these signature threads you've been making are drawing them in like bees to honey. I know I've been rather blunt about it all, but I'm not trying to be offensive. This is my advice; if you want people to take your creations seriously, they have to show effort. Not counting the time it takes to download the fonts, the "signatures" on this thread would have taken less than a minute each to make. The same thing goes for your previous thread; slapping official Sugimori artwork onto a black or white background with a name shows no effort either. These things attract attention, but none of it is positive. If you step up your game and truly create something, people will appreciate it and perhaps even admire it. If you take these words to heart, you'll find yourself improving instead of being a target of trolls. ur juts gelus of hitmanxs signaturs. u cnt mak segs liek hitmanx Smoki 1 Link to comment
TorCharDrawings Posted September 1, 2013 Share Posted September 1, 2013 The generally accepted definition of a signature on the internet is a combination of text and graphics that is attached to the end of a user's post. Downloading a font and typing a name on an image little over 50 pixels in width isn't a signature (and it's not exactly "creative" either). Basically, the title is misleading. "REAL" also implies quality - something that takes more than a minute and a fancy font. Moving on, these "signatures" are rather pointless. In order to actually use it on anything, it would have to be painstakingly cut out, and because they're absolutely tiny it would have to be almost pixel by pixel. It would be far, far easier for someone planning on using something like this to simply download the font and type it themselves. Let's take the "signature" on this artwork as an example. The words are applied directly onto the image - no white box around them and no need for cutting it out. Most of all though, it's 60p and even then it's relatively small. A 43x22 image done in a font between 14p and 18p is just far too small to be of use for anything. Even if you were doing them in 60p, it's still small on my artwork above which was done at 2000x1700 (reduced for this post). That's not as big as it sounds. A signature is always the last thing added to a piece anyway. Before you start doing the same thing but bigger though, it really doesn't take much - if any - creativity to download a font from a site like Dafont then write a person's name. If you did these by hand with a graphics tablet it would be different, but you're using a font, which requires zero effort. You say that you will be "very creative" but have yet to prove it. The signature below would be much better received as it's something that was written and drawn from scratch. Although it's lacking in quality as I spent all of about two minutes on it, it does at least show effort and is the sort of thing that would be at least somewhat appreciated. People troll almost every thread in some way, but these signature threads you've been making are drawing them in like bees to honey. I know I've been rather blunt about it all, but I'm not trying to be offensive. This is my advice; if you want people to take your creations seriously, they have to show effort. Not counting the time it takes to download the fonts, the "signatures" on this thread would have taken less than a minute each to make. The same thing goes for your previous thread; slapping official Sugimori artwork onto a black or white background with a name shows no effort either. These things attract attention, but none of it is positive. If you step up your game and truly create something, people will appreciate it and perhaps even admire it. If you take these words to heart, you'll find yourself improving instead of being a target of trolls. Can you tell me wich program and tool you used to make that lucario sig? Link to comment
Rache Posted September 1, 2013 Share Posted September 1, 2013 Can you tell me wich program and tool you used to make that lucario sig? Paint Tool SAI~ You'll need a graphics tablet to really make use of it though. Link to comment
TorCharDrawings Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Paint Tool SAI~ You'll need a graphics tablet to really make use of it though. oh i have a Bamboo pen and touch.. so guess ill be okay? Link to comment
Rache Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 oh i have a Bamboo pen and touch.. so guess ill be okay? Yup~ If you use that with Paint Tool SAI and increase the stabilizer (part of the program), you can make smooth, crisp lines. Link to comment
TorCharDrawings Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Yup~ If you use that with Paint Tool SAI and increase the stabilizer (part of the program), you can make smooth, crisp lines. okay, thank you very much :D Link to comment
Recommended Posts