Glacius Posted March 16, 2013 Share Posted March 16, 2013 i no like use brain please yes TM read bad for glacius [spoiler]I support this as well[/spoiler] Link to comment
CauseWreck Posted March 17, 2013 Share Posted March 17, 2013 simple.... and useful.... +1 Link to comment
Selfdestructo Posted March 17, 2013 Share Posted March 17, 2013 It's a good idea if you dislike scamming. As the inventor of the Team Rocket challenge (use only pokemon scammed off other players) I dislike this suggestion. It was by far the easiest scam to pull. Tell people that TM28 was Earthquake, when they didn't realize until after the trade that I'd actually just traded them Dig. Don't actomatically assume that scamming is a bad thing. This is the pokemon world. Team Rocket thrives on scamming. Hence, scamming is legal. Making scamming impossible means killing Team Rocket. If you support this idea you support KILLING JESSE AND JAMES. Are you in favor of the death penalty? [img]http://img853.imageshack.us/img853/8749/evilwz.png[/img] Link to comment
NaitDawg Posted March 17, 2013 Share Posted March 17, 2013 ^Exactly my point. Please devs, implement this idea. Link to comment
DoctorPBC Posted March 17, 2013 Share Posted March 17, 2013 +3 Because these sexy girls in bed with me also agree Vaeldras 1 Link to comment
JS6786 Posted March 17, 2013 Share Posted March 17, 2013 I hate how in every good suggestion thread, people have to comment saying "sounds good to me, but it's probably not too important and the dev's don't need to implement it" this is what this forum is for! be adamant about our suggestions! argue pros and cons, and don't worry about "too hard to be implemented" or "a waste of dev's time." let the devs settle those issues for themselves. Vaeldras, Fratley, Hol and 1 other 4 Link to comment
JS6786 Posted March 17, 2013 Share Posted March 17, 2013 with that said, mad support for this idea Link to comment
Munya Posted March 17, 2013 Share Posted March 17, 2013 [quote name='JS6786' timestamp='1363503362' post='232457'] "sounds good to me, but it's probably not too important and the dev's don't need to implement it" [/quote] Nobody said that, it was simply stated there are more important things that need to be implemented first. Trading tm's is a working mechanic, even if it could be better. There are a bunch of broken things that could use fixing first. Link to comment
JS6786 Posted March 17, 2013 Share Posted March 17, 2013 [quote name='Munya' timestamp='1363403254' post='230739'] I like it, but not enough to say they should make it a priority since idk what this would involve needing be done. [/quote] you yourself say that it's not important enough to "make it a priority." Link to comment
Munya Posted March 17, 2013 Share Posted March 17, 2013 I'd assume the people who liked that post generally believe that broken mechanics should have priority over something that already works. I'd hardly say me myself. Link to comment
Fratley Posted March 18, 2013 Share Posted March 18, 2013 [quote name='Munya' timestamp='1363525397' post='232637'] Nobody said that, it was simply stated there are more important things that need to be implemented first. .... There are a bunch of broken things that could use fixing first. [/quote] And all these broken things like missing moves, animations, TMs, etc are things that the Devs are undoubtedly already aware of and working on at the moment. If ideas are going to be shot down because they're deemed 'not as important' as the necessary things then what's the point of this suggestion forum? You guys need to stop speaking up for the developers. Amrykid and JS6786 2 Link to comment
Munya Posted March 18, 2013 Share Posted March 18, 2013 [quote name='Fratley' timestamp='1363624520' post='234335'] And all these broken things like missing moves, animations, TMs, etc are things that the Devs are undoubtedly already aware of and working on at the moment. If ideas are going to be shot down because they're deemed 'not as important' as the necessary things then what's the point of this suggestion forum? You guys need to stop speaking up for the developers. [/quote] Nobody shot the idea down, if you had read you would actually see that it has been mostly agreed with. But there are more important things to be fixed than something that is already working. [quote name='Munya' timestamp='1363403254' post='230739'] I like it [/quote] Link to comment
Fratley Posted March 18, 2013 Share Posted March 18, 2013 [quote name='Munya' timestamp='1363625345' post='234354'] Nobody shot the idea down, if you had read you would actually see that it has been mostly agreed with. [b]But there are more important things to be fixed than something that is already working.[/b] [/quote] [img]http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20070526081822/uncyclopedia/images/thumb/1/15/CaptainobviousChooseOption.jpg/200px-CaptainobviousChooseOption.jpg[/img] I know. We know. Everyone knows that. We don't need the same spam on every suggestion. Important things get fixed first, we get it. JS6786 and MinyBoy5 2 Link to comment
Munya Posted March 18, 2013 Share Posted March 18, 2013 Pretty sure I have only replied to like 2 suggestions in the last month this being one, please quit taking your anger out on me. Link to comment
Fratley Posted March 18, 2013 Share Posted March 18, 2013 [quote name='Munya' timestamp='1363625970' post='234368'] [img]http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view/347026/best-cry-ever-intervention-o.gif[/img] [/quote] Gimme a break. Link to comment
JS6786 Posted March 18, 2013 Share Posted March 18, 2013 [quote name='Fratley' timestamp='1363625670' post='234362'] [img]http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20070526081822/uncyclopedia/images/thumb/1/15/CaptainobviousChooseOption.jpg/200px-CaptainobviousChooseOption.jpg[/img] I know. We know. Everyone knows that. We don't need the same spam on every suggestion. Important things get fixed first, we get it. [/quote] Fratley be my hero Fratley 1 Link to comment
KurapikaET Posted March 18, 2013 Share Posted March 18, 2013 +1 [spoiler]I am paranoiac. :$[/spoiler] Link to comment
Halvaard Posted April 19, 2013 Share Posted April 19, 2013 [quote name='Selfdestructo' timestamp='1363496594' post='232362'] It's a good idea if you dislike scamming. As the inventor of the Team Rocket challenge (use only pokemon scammed off other players) I dislike this suggestion. It was by far the easiest scam to pull. Tell people that TM28 was Earthquake, when they didn't realize until after the trade that I'd actually just traded them Dig. Don't actomatically assume that scamming is a bad thing. This is the pokemon world. Team Rocket thrives on scamming. Hence, scamming is legal. Making scamming impossible means killing Team Rocket. If you support this idea you support KILLING JESSE AND JAMES. Are you in favor of the death penalty? [img]http://img853.imageshack.us/img853/8749/evilwz.png[/img] [/quote] WELL, since I block anyone I see admitting they're doing a TR challenge or bragging about a scam they pulled off, then yeah, DOWN WITH TEAM ROCKET! Link to comment
Govictory Posted April 19, 2013 Share Posted April 19, 2013 I am all for this idea no more scams (unless it is a noob who isn't that smart). +1k Link to comment
telachupo Posted April 19, 2013 Share Posted April 19, 2013 less dangerous than lucky egg problem, but still neccesary. Link to comment
Ductape Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 Ive been +1 to this idea for a long time now. Link to comment
JWingWangWong Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 [url="https://forums.pokemmo.eu/index.php?/topic/17236-perfecting-the-trading-system/"]Back in my trading thread[/url], I mentioned something about how a TM could be identified. What if you didn't need to attach a TM to a Pokemon and you could just simply drag and drop the item to the trading interface? If you wanted more information about the TM you cover either hover over it like in the bag or do something like this: [img]http://gyazo.com/73d6600caf11555ee4815123f38274fe.png?1365023428[/img] But I do like the idea of knowing what the TM is. I support it if some form of it comes to exist. Edit: Wrong link in the first sentence. Halvaard and Ductape 2 Link to comment
Recommended Posts