gbwead Posted January 24, 2022 Author Share Posted January 24, 2022 Extension Tuesday, January 25th, 2 AM UTC: zKuroko Vs Lachidrago An instant sub will be required in the event one of the players doesn't show up. Tuesday, January 25th, 2 AM UTC = Monday, January 24th, 9 PM UTC-5 @Mlhawk @Axelgor @zKuroko @lachidrago (signed up by @DrTylerGrey) Link to comment
DoubleJ Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 Gb can kick his teammates for acting scummy and all but yo... Jean just lost =( Kupokun 1 Link to comment
gbwead Posted January 24, 2022 Author Share Posted January 24, 2022 (edited) @camilo7 Are you willing to play your duel Vs Badbaar? @Xigbar Are you willing to play your duel Vs Enchanteur? YES or NO. NOTHING ELSE. YES or NO. You can't change your decision after you submitted your answer. Edited January 24, 2022 by gbwead KaynineXL, ItzGray, Quinn010 and 2 others 5 Link to comment
CaptnBaklava Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 10 minutes ago, gbwead said: @camilo7 Are you willing to play your duel Vs Badbaar? @Xigbar Are you willing to play your duel Vs Enchanteur? YES or NO. NOTHING ELSE. YES or NO. Can have CaioxLive fill in one spot? NiceRNGbro, Luke, JeanMarc and 4 others 7 Link to comment
gbwead Posted January 24, 2022 Author Share Posted January 24, 2022 (edited) NVM Edited January 24, 2022 by gbwead Zhikodark 1 Link to comment
heichicoda Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 48分钟前,CaptnBaklava 说: Can have CaioxLive fill in one spot? That's too bold? NiceRNGbro and RysPicz 2 Link to comment
gbwead Posted January 24, 2022 Author Share Posted January 24, 2022 6 hours ago, gbwead said: @camilo7 Are you willing to play your duel Vs Badbaar? @Xigbar Are you willing to play your duel Vs Enchanteur? YES or NO. NOTHING ELSE. YES or NO. You can't change your decision after you submitted your answer. Spoiler Ok, Qwilfish' n' Chips' will be awarded an activity win for that match. DoubleJ 1 Link to comment
DoubleJ Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 Scumfish and Co. are #1 Quinn010 1 Link to comment
Xigbar Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 So you end up giving what they told u to do since yesterday but You deny to do cause you wanted to help them to think clear about that decision but after all the drama stuff They continue with the same idea of not duel and u end up giving activity. Whoops. DoubleJ and Cristi 2 Link to comment
RysPicz Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 24 minutes ago, Xigbar said: So you end up giving what they told u to do since yesterday but You deny to do cause you wanted to help them to think clear about that decision but after all the drama stuff They continue with the same idea of not duel and u end up giving activity. Whoops. And I actually do like and respect GB for that decision. His job as a host is to do his best to get the matches played and this is exactly what he was doing. Kanzo, Huargensy, Poufilou and 7 others 9 1 Link to comment
Quinn010 Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 me and tohnr in 30 UU monotype UU 1v1 and normal UU bo3 XD Link to comment
gbwead Posted January 24, 2022 Author Share Posted January 24, 2022 I have talked to Luke, Enchanteur, Sejuani and Pablo. Sejuani and Pablo will play their week 6 duel in the next following hours. Enchanteur has changed his mind regarding his duel vs Badbaar. He wants to face Badbaar, but sadly the activity decision that was announced earlier today was final: 2 hours ago, gbwead said: Reveal hidden contents Ok, Qwilfish' n' Chips' will be awarded an activity win for that match. If Qwilfish n' Chips' wants to fight for that win instead of claiming the activity win, they can, but I will not force them to do so. Quinn010, DoubleJ and NiceRNGbro 3 Link to comment
Quinn010 Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 15 minutes ago, gbwead said: If Qwilfish n' Chips' wants to fight for that win instead of claiming the activity win, they can, but I will not force them to do so. go play then ^_^ KaynineXL 1 Link to comment
Lunarck Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 16 hours ago, DoubleJ said: Gb can kick his teammates for acting scummy and all but yo... Jean just lost =( Why are you obsessed with Jean @DoubleJ ?? DoubleJ 1 Link to comment
Quinn010 Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 (normal uu game) (1v1 uu) won RysPicz, RLotus, NiceRNGbro and 1 other 4 Link to comment
gbwead Posted January 24, 2022 Author Share Posted January 24, 2022 (edited) Pablobacas Vs Sejuani Sejuani wanted to do this duel as soon as possible, preferably on weekdays. He disclosed that he was available 14 hours every weekday for a total of 70 hours. Pablobacas disclosed that he was available 12 hours on Sunday and not at other times because he had to prepare another PSL duel for the week. Sejuani did not really want to go to an extension, but ended up accepting to play on Monday after the deadline. If he had refused, I would have probably forced Pablobacas to be subbed out, but it never got to that. Sejuani still asked everyday, including Saturday and Sunday, if Pablo was available, but Pablo insisted on playing on Monday. Following the drama of Badbaar vs Enchanteur, I was made aware that there was a good chance that Sejuani would forfeit his duel as well; Sejuani even left the private DM where the scheduling was being done. I told Luke, Lotus, Pablobacas and perhaps other members of Qwilfish n' Chips' that if Sejuani doesn't show up for the scheduled duel, Pablobacas would get the win. I also said that after 3 PM UTC (the week 6 deadline) Qwilfish would be allowed to ask Sejuani directly about his intentions and, if he said he wasn't going to play, then Qwilfish would be awarded the activity win instantly. Today (Monday) after I receive an answer from Badbaar and Enchanteur and after I announced the contenders for best NU player, Sejuani informs me that he is really looking forward to his duel vs pablobacas. I add Sejuani back to the scheduling DM. Luke said he's fine with the duel happening as long as Pablo is okay with it as well. Pablo says he's fine with playing the duel. However, I don't know who exactly because most of the discussion is in spanish, but either Pablo or Sejuani is suggesting to play a random battle instead of an NU duel to which I object instantly. At that point, Luke starts fearing that Enchanteur will ask to play Vs Badbaar if Sejuani wins vs Pablo and says he will not accept the Sejuani Vs Pablo duel unless he knows for sure he got the win for Badbaar Vs Enchanteur. I tell Luke that Pablo needs to take his duel seriously and that may be a possiblity. Enchanteur wants absolutely nothing to do with this week anymore, but I convince him to reconsider his position on Badbaar duel. He finally does and is willing to play. Qwilfish n' Chips' still have the activity win on Badbaar's duel, so they won the week. However, now that Enchanteur changed his mind, the duel may be played if Qwilfish declines the activity win. They do not decline the activity win, so Qwilfish win the week, it's done, set in stone. Suddenly, once Qwilfish has the win guarenteed, Luke wants to claim the activity win for the Sejuani duel and claims that the lack of answer from Sejuani for the last day meant that Pablobacas had stopped preparing for his duel. Luke also informs me that Pablo suddenly feels betrayed, tricked and pressured by AW players and he no longer wants to play the duel. Considering that Luke said earlier that he was going to support Pablo playing the duel if he wanted, I ask Pablo myself in the scheduling DM what is going on since I am not interested in heresay. Pablo says that he doesn't want to go against his manager or his team, but he also wants to fight Sejuani if that helps him get MVP. Pablo even offers to give a FREE win to Sejuani to which I object. Luke interjects mutliple times in that conversation with Pablo because he feels entitled to that activity win and doesn't want to subject his player to any more pressure. I'm not confortable with the degree of dodging that has been displayed by Pablo this week with the support of Luke: offering free wins, making excuses and fishing for an activity win for a duel that could have been played. I also do not believe forcing Pablo and Sejuani to play is an option anymore since I saw on multiple occasions clear indications that Pablo could throw the duel. Therefore, I have decided that Sejuani will be awarded an activity win in this case. Activity wins/loses will not be considered on the ranking sheet. Edited January 25, 2022 by gbwead Kanzo, RysPicz, Zhikodark and 1 other 4 Link to comment
Zhikodark Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 3 hours ago, RysPicz said: And I actually do like and respect GB for that decision. His job as a host is to do his best to get the matches played and this is exactly what he was doing. I finally agree with you DoubleJ 1 Link to comment
Poufilou Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 cant wait the Netflix documentary on this SnowOT and CaptnBaklava 2 Link to comment
Umbramol Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 The moment grown ass men are throwing a tantrum and the host instead of cutting this bullshit, sits and takes it and lets a manager throw antiques along with his player and dictate the whole event with this, the event itself losses its credibility. for 2 days now we are begging people to play that they dont want to.. they failed to show. the week is over. activity win goes to quilfish. simple as that.. the rest is bullshit.. Enchanteur shows disrespect to the whole competition and all the other players. his and the opponents. we made a soap opera out of this. tragic really. its the easiest activity decisions ever.. If they dont want to play they should lose the games and also get banned. as it happened to players that didnt show in their teams and refused to play for their managers. terrible decision making in this event. DoubleJ, Xigbar, RLotus and 1 other 2 2 Link to comment
Frag Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 So, if i get it correctly, Luke was tryharding for activity wins?, shame. Dontea, Kanzo, camilo7 and 2 others 5 Link to comment
DoubleJ Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 14 minutes ago, Frag said: So, if i get it correctly, Luke was tryharding for activity wins?, shame. Yes, and encanto took the bait Link to comment
SejuaniSupport Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 55 minutes ago, Umbramol said: The moment grown ass men are throwing a tantrum and the host instead of cutting this bullshit, sits and takes it and lets a manager throw antiques along with his player and dictate the whole event with this, the event itself losses its credibility. for 2 days now we are begging people to play that they dont want to.. they failed to show. the week is over. activity win goes to quilfish. simple as that.. the rest is bullshit.. Enchanteur shows disrespect to the whole competition and all the other players. his and the opponents. we made a soap opera out of this. tragic really. its the easiest activity decisions ever.. If they dont want to play they should lose the games and also get banned. as it happened to players that didnt show in their teams and refused to play for their managers. terrible decision making in this event. camilo7 and SnowOT 2 Link to comment
Sebat Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 #DontGiveUp #VamosBats #ZhikoCarry DoubleJ, Zhikodark and Poufilou 3 Link to comment
DoubleJ Posted January 24, 2022 Share Posted January 24, 2022 Meanwhile Zhiko still carries Zhikodark 1 Link to comment
Mlhawk Posted January 25, 2022 Share Posted January 25, 2022 YEYOxD vs Inuyashal in 10 mins Link to comment
Recommended Posts