Jump to content

psl when ._.


Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, Paul said:

We have 2 holiday events within the next 2 months (3 within 4 months), would it not be ideal to wait? Nobody is going to donate over investing in these events, I would imagine 

idk yetto donated a lot of money to lcpl 1 month b4 halloween i think most of the time people donate if they have a lot of money the 1m donations not gonna change anything 

Link to comment
19 hours ago, gbwead said:

Number of tiers?

Which tiers?

this just my personal opinion but i think 6tiers is the best format (ou ou uu nu lc dubs)if you go with more tiers the event would be less competitive since your forced to draft a lot of players. 
 

 

14 hours ago, gbwead said:

Midseason?
Trades?

pls no .-. i think stuff like this kill the event players throwing etc. just make a good draft from the start ? 

Link to comment
22 hours ago, gbwead said:

What PSL format are people interested in?

  • Number of tiers?
  • Which tiers?
  • Manager selection?
  • Managers allowed to play?
  • Auction format?
  • Banned players?
  • Cash prize distribution?
  • What else?

-5

-OU/UU/NU/DUBS/LC

- yes

-yes

-yes

- Dont know enough about last PSL's to make a statement

-yes

 

17 hours ago, gbwead said:

Midseason?
Trades?
Showdown?
Multiple hosts?
Language translators?

-no

-no

-no

-yes

-yes

Link to comment

Starting to organize PSL would be great, waiting for LCPL to finish will only delay everything, if you start organizing from now it is likely that the event will start at the end of LCPL.

Even if you start with the fundraiser, you could raise more money and not be left with the same funds as WC.

I think this is the best format: OU UU NU DUBS LC SSOU MP MP (Manager Pick).

Manager Selection: Select managers based on the criteria of experience, seniority, achievements and popularity

Managers Allowed to play: Yes

Auction Format: Classic Format (LCPL)

Banned Players: Sofiik

Cash Prize Distribution: 70% to the winners, 10% for individual prizes and 20% fro 2th place

Link to comment
1 hour ago, GasaiYunoSan said:

Comenzar a organizar PSL sería genial, esperar a que LCPL termine solo retrasará todo, si comienzas a organizar a partir de ahora es probable que el evento comience al final de LCPL.

Incluso si comienza con la recaudación de fondos, podría recaudar más dinero y no quedarse con los mismos fondos que WC.

Creo que este es el mejor formato: OU UU NU DUBS LC SSOU MP MP (Selección del gerente).

Selección de gerentes: seleccione gerentes según los criterios de experiencia, antigüedad, logros y popularidad.

Administradores autorizados a jugar: Sí

Formato de subasta: formato clásico (LCPL)

Jugadores prohibidos: Sofiik

Distribución de premios en efectivo: 70% a los ganadores, 10% para premios individuales y 20% para el 2do lugar

Ss OU is trash, ty

Link to comment
1 hour ago, GasaiYunoSan said:

Starting to organize PSL would be great, waiting for LCPL to finish will only delay everything, if you start organizing from now it is likely that the event will start at the end of LCPL.

Even if you start with the fundraiser, you could raise more money and not be left with the same funds as WC.

I think this is the best format: OU UU NU DUBS LC SSOU MP MP (Manager Pick).

Manager Selection: Select managers based on the criteria of experience, seniority, achievements and popularity

Managers Allowed to play: Yes

Auction Format: Classic Format (LCPL)

Banned Players: Sofiik

Cash Prize Distribution: 70% to the winners, 10% for individual prizes and 20% fro 2th place

OU, OU, UU, NU, Dubs, LC, Manager Pick, Manager Pick. I think it is the best format, regarding the distribution of prizes, I agree. With the format of the last PSL, it was a joke the prize of the champions.

P.S. SSOU is Trash.

Link to comment
16 minutes ago, gbwead said:

 

f7bb0245ce3e51e044943f3271081975.png

I was thinking of the following formula for potential manager selection. The players with the highest scores would be selected. Thoughts?

 

 

 

 

It's insane how much effort you put into this trash community. Thank you for that

Edited by CaptnBaklava
Link to comment

@gbwead I like the previously banned making an application null piece to your algorithm, otherwise someone like myself would just have a fuck ton of points and get auto-managered (fuck ton of accolades, previous participation, managed several times with good finishes... and a lot of bad). The downside that I'm alluding to though is that your algorithm still weighs heavily toward old players who want to come back, even with the accolades being scaled. Regardless, looks lit and I approve.

Link to comment
On 10/30/2021 at 5:45 PM, DoubleJ said:

@gbwead I like the previously banned making an application null piece to your algorithm, otherwise someone like myself would just have a fuck ton of points and get auto-managered (fuck ton of accolades, previous participation, managed several times with good finishes... and a lot of bad). The downside that I'm alluding to though is that your algorithm still weighs heavily toward old players who want to come back, even with the accolades being scaled. Regardless, looks lit and I approve.

Some examples:


Huargensy

Spoiler

2021 --> (9 wins + 5 second places) x 1 = 11.5
2020 --> (2 wins + 5 second places) x 0.9 = 4.05

Banned/Released: No (x1)
Participated before: Yes (x1)
Won a season as manage: No (x1)
Regular season performance: N/A (x1)

Total: (11.5+4.05)x1x1x1x1= 15.55

Luke

Spoiler

2021 -->(3 wins + 1 second place) x 1 = 3.5
2020 --> (2 second places) x 0.9 = 0.9
2019 -->(4 wins + 3 second places) x 0.8 = 4.4
Banned/Released: No (x1)
Participated before: Yes (x1)
Won a season as manage: Yes (x2)
Regular season performance: 3rd (x1)

Total: (3.5+0.9+4.4)x1x1x2x1 = 17.6

DoubleJ

Spoiler

2018 --> (1 win) x 0.7 = 0.7
2017 --> (3 wins + 2 second places) x 0.6 = 2.4
2016 --> (4 wins + 1 second places) x 0.5 = 2.25
2015 -->  (4 wins + 4 second places) x 0.4 = 2.4
2014 --> (2 wins + 4 second places) x 0.3 = 1.2
2013 --> (1 win + 1 second place) x 0.2 = 0.3
Banned/Released: Yes (x0)
Participated before: Yes (x1)
Won a season as manage: No (x1)
Regular season performance: 3rd in season 5(x1)
Regular season performance: 4th in season 8(x1)
Regular season performance: 5th in season 2(x0.75)
Regular season performance: 8th in season 3(x0.5)

Total: (0.7+2.4+2.25+2.4+1.2+0.3)x0x1x1x1x1x0.75x0.5= 0
Total without considering the ban critera: 3.47

KaynineXL

Spoiler

2016 --> (5 wins + 3 second places)x0.5 = 3.25
2015 --> (1 win) x 0.4 = 0.4

Banned/Released: No (x1)
Participated before: Yes (x1)
Won a season as manage: No (x1)
Regular season performance: 1st in season 6 (x1.25)
Regular season performance: 1st in season 5 (x1.25)

Total: (3.25+0.4)x1x1x1x1.25x1.25 = 5.70

xSparkie

Spoiler

2021 --> (1 win) x 1 = 1
2020 --> (1 win) x 0.9 = 0.9
2017 --> (5 wins + 4 second places) x 0.6 = 4.2
2016 --> (1 win + 1 second place) x 0.5 = 0.75

2015 --> (1 win) x 0.4 = 0.4
Banned/Released: No (x1)
Participated before: Yes (x1)
Won a season as manage: No (x1)
Regular season performance: 8th in PSL 11 (x0.5)

Total: (1+0.9+4.2+0.75+0.4)x1x1x1x0.5= 3.625

As you can see, with or without the null factor for banned players, the scaling based on recency is enough to ensure the active players of today are favored.

Edited by gbwead
Link to comment
1 hour ago, DoubleJ said:

@gbwead I like the previously banned making an application null piece to your algorithm, otherwise someone like myself would just have a fuck ton of points and get auto-managered (fuck ton of accolades, previous participation, managed several times with good finishes... and a lot of bad). The downside that I'm alluding to though is that your algorithm still weighs heavily toward old players who want to come back, even with the accolades being scaled. Regardless, looks lit and I approve.

 

26 minutes ago, gbwead said:

DoubleJ

  Hide contents

2018 --> (1 win) x 0.7 = 0.7
2017 --> (3 wins + 2 second places) x 0.6 = 2.4
2016 --> (4 wins + 1 second places) x 0.5 = 2.25
2015 -->  (4 wins + 4 second places) x 0.4 = 2.4
2014 --> (2 wins + 4 second places) x 0.3 = 1.2
2013 --> (1 win + 1 second place) x 0.2 = 0.3
Banned/Released: Yes (x0)
Participated before: Yes (x1)
Won a season as manage: No (x1)
Regular season performance: 3rd in season 5(x1)
Regular season performance: 4th in season 8(x1)
Regular season performance: 5th in season 2(x0.75)
Regular season performance: 8th in season 3(x0.5)

Total: (0.7+2.4+2.25+2.4+1.2+0.3)x0x1x1x1x1x0.75x0.5= 0
Total without considering the ban critera: 3.47

 

That did not age well ?

Edited by CaptnBaklava
Link to comment
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.