Jump to content

rivalphillip

Members
  • Posts

    40
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

rivalphillip last won the day on April 13 2021

rivalphillip had the most liked content!

2 Followers

About rivalphillip

  • Birthday 09/23/1998

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    :USA
  • IGN
    rivalphillip

Contact Methods

  • Discord
    Phillip#0001

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

rivalphillip's Achievements

  1. Never heard of him unfortunately, but if we're bring back people it better be aimi.
  2. With all due respect, 25 is fine. If it were increased further it'd be unnecessary, and in the future people would press it to be further increased most likely.
  3. I'd rather remain neutral, neither plus nor minus. Something like this would take considerable consideration to be implemented properly, and it's above my head. I just wanted to put my input in from my perspective.
  4. Okay, I've given it a little thought. Here's my thought process: Let's say a potential reward is a pp-up/pp-max, and untradeable to boot. Now, that's a pretty good reward right? If someone can get this for free, why would anyone buy one when they can wait for a free one? This can be applied to any reward in this suggestion, as I said; it's not a bad idea. It just really has to be thought about. The economy is already pretty bad (in my opinion obviously, i'm not some sort of economy expert). A reward I can possibly see is a random pokemon that you do not currently own (in its base form), that is classified as a gift pokemon just as a thank you for logging in and continuing to play. Even that has its drawbacks, i'm aware.
  5. I don't quite agree, just because it's something all games have doesn't mean this one needs it. If it is implemented, the rewards would have to be heavily regulated as to not destroy value of certain items, even ones not thought as consequential. I'm not saying it's a bad idea, but perhaps not entirely necessary for pokemmo.
  6. Thanks for your help, this wouldn't have been possible without you or xJose. Again, best of luck everyone!
  7. Is it safe to assume there's no alts or was it not possible to check? Only asking because of the "as it is" comment. Either way, I'm happy it's being drawn and best of luck to everyone included.
  8. I'm sure it'll get done as soon as Bear has some spare time, I have to be patient just like all of you. It's a lot of names, and they probably normally don't check for alts (dunno how this stuff really works, this is my first giveaway on the forum). I wouldn't be too excited having to go through 200 names either if I were him lol.
  9. You're in the same boat as me if it feels any better.
  10. I'm still awaiting a response from whoever is gonna check, I have no idea how long it'll be. Last I heard they were busy (yesterday), I wish I had more info for you guys, sorry.
  11. Sorry, the tickets are already sold out on the giveaway, the winner hasn't been declared yet but here is the thread linked here if you'd still like to check it out:
  12. I tend to hang onto pokemon from 2013/2014/2015 myself, memories too op. You're not the only one.
  13. Alright, the list of 200 has been added to the spoiler. Please read the beginning of the spoiler thoroughly so you have a better understanding of my thought process behind it. I tried my best but if there is any flaw/error you can see let me know, and if it's necessary the change will be made. Thank you all for playing, and best of luck.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.