PoochieHead

  >implying [clutches chest]   Welcome. I think you have good taste in Pokemon. Your forum username is maybe different story comrade, unsure if I'm on Myspace 10 years ago right now with all dat Xs and numbers.

>staff actually arguing against this   Help, oppression! Seriously though, and this is directed to anyone: am I wrong to say that Ditto, in all its omnipresent systemic overuse as a mechanic, could maybe stand to see a more decentralized breeding system? Genderless Pokemon may be less common, but anyone who has a useful genderless in his or her PC stands to benefit at the expense of... what, exactly? Ditto? I'm okay with that, and I think you should be too. All I'm saying is there's good design, and then there's "The breeding system still allows you to manipulate genderless species, just not at the same ease." That's an argument for inconsistency, and not the good kind that makes things interesting and diverse, but the bad kind that generates artificial difficulty.   Let me tell you how much I love artificial difficulty: [spoiler][/spoiler]

I'm like "Hey, what's up, helloooo"

I had a feeling you'd say that. Here you go.

Or you could make this really simple and just say you want O-Powers.

There's nothing wrong with the idea, I just think there are (as you said) more useful ideas out there. But as long as this isn't a priority I don't see the harm in it happening somewhere along the line. The bank stuff, on the other hand, sounds a little ridiculous to me. Interest? Really?

But soft! what grease through yonder fryer breaks? It is the spud, and Luna is the fry.

  Going forward, if someone plans on using the term tl;dr, I'd rather he or she doesn't post in my suggestions at all.