Jump to content

alphatheomegaaa

Members
  • Posts

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About alphatheomegaaa

  • Birthday 11/19/1997

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • IGN
    Titan

Contact Methods

  • Skype
    Zombiehunter12345

Recent Profile Visitors

518 profile views

alphatheomegaaa's Achievements

  1. Who Can I message/email to discuss why 2 of my accounts were banned?

  2. If someone can spam Bslam on your then your a fool-of-a-took because your allowing that to happen to yourself. Will it happen eventually ofc thats what happens, but your arguement is based on solely on What If's, a scenario where everything goes wrong, but eventually there will be a match where everything does go wrong. You cant cry about it, it happened, its just luck(aka chance)
  3. Then you've never played Pokemon. I would rather face chance Para over an assured +1Def +1Att Snorlax. Your arguement is on theory, We can discuss the what ifs, but what will happen when that snorlax setups is your going to lose, unless you have Haze or you get lucky with a Fighting move crit. You can't argue with theories or what if scenarios because those aren't facts, this game is based around Rng. There are crits, Rolls, Statuses, flinches, and misses are all unfair according to your theories. They make the game unfair and unbalanced then? So we should take them all out! fuck crits, fuck parahax, fuck confusion, fuck misses, fuck everything that makes this game interesting and the variables that make this game so great.
  4. So then Twave should be banned due Paralysis to? its a guaranteed to paralysis and leads to the 25% chance to be fully paralyzed. Percentage sums are not a real thing, numbers don't work like that. It's 30% every time, the Dice(aka Roll) doesn't remember if you last hit was not a para. On top of everything your exsamples are what if's. I can Crit every time i use a move, because it's a "what if" a 30% chance isn't high enough to guarantee those paralysis. So your arguement is in theory with numbers that don't actually exists. I can pull shit out of my ass but facts are facts. What if there's a giant spaghetti monster? oh only rubi may know.
  5. it was done in early 2014, i don't see whats wrong, and Bslam isnt op. Sure the 30% or so is obsurd and makes it a numbers game, but rng is always involved in Pokemon, crits can happen at any moment, misses can happen any-moment, and statuses are part of the game. If you have bad luck well shit sucks your unlucky, but thats something that you have to risk. If banning 1 move on 1 poke is complex, then i feel like tyrone might need to get educated in the meaning of complexity. Edit: Phone Autocorrect is dumb af
  6. I don't understand why its so hard to just ban curse like you guys did years ago. Cb Lax can at least be Counter and require prediction, skill, and an actually knowledge of sets. It is somewhat unfair to have to carry a move such as Haze just for 1 Pokemon because you know its going to be there. Curse is the only problem, Snorlax thickens the meta with another SP wall, but with curse just becomes to much of an issue
  7. IGN:Fernie TimeZone:PST Tiers:Ou,UU,NU,Showdown ADV OU Fluff:i aint got no fluffs
  8. Interested in Shiny Snorlax? (Relaxed) 14/25/29/31/14/13
  9. like 2 and a half years ago Curse was banned for a while which worked pretty well imo,besides Chansey, Snor is the only real viable Sp wall, but when it is really Op is when it comes to its set with curse due to only requiring 2 turns to really setup,after that its just like f this shit theres no point unless u Crit a fighting move or Dbond him I personally dont think Bslam is the problem, Return and Dedge do the same job and sometimes even better somtimes when ur +1 or +2 being able to give u that added stab and damage, just my 2 cents
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.