Sashaolin
-
Posts
875 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
5
Posts posted by Sashaolin
-
-
7 minutes ago, RysPicz said:
I honestly (personally) couldn't give a hot shit about this vanity, everyone knows Aura was the best team during at least one year, even despite the fact that we are dead for at least 4-5 years, we are still one of the top teams to ever greet this game. I do not need a vanity to go back with my memories to the team tours we won back in the old days. Sure it would be cool, but I don't need it. I would rather write new history with my new team and just remind myself about how great was our team with a tear in my eye.
It would be a cool form of acknowledging us, our team and what we have brought to this game etc, but I personally don't need it.
@YettoDie speak Nerd pls what you think about it, you were leading that team with me for years, we could use your input since we are also topic of discussion
Come on 4f, like I give a fuck about a vanity?
Let's just put it in context, a guy came out of nowhere, he changed the history books and then he acts like nothing happened, even worse he's impersonating the victim and I should remain silent for life?
It won't happen like that, I still have an unfair warning point to receive before my retirement. -
19 hours ago, Bearminator said:
Friendly reminder i was player of TT for years, leading my team. We were absolutely worst at it, but we tried. Then i reffed, then I hosted. Its not like i just took TT as mine cause no one wanted it ^^. Formula makes it possible for team with no TT wins to win a year, but its so highly unlikely that i dont even consider it an option. Matter of opinion, to choose which one is better.
Should have speak of formula sooner, guys. When - after 3 years - GB started talk about improvements, I argued with him, then we have found middle ground, giving more spotlight to wins.
I might grind teeth sometimes if I hear same discussions 15th time with same arguments from both sides, but I did not tried to make TT bigger than it was because i wanted to show off some formula- i did it from never ending passion for idea of this tournament. Some asked for more spotlight from tts, i made general standings. Increase in prizes in meantime, then finally vanities. I would never spend hours reading discords discussions, pms, etc if I wouldnt care, so lets assume i do and work forward.
So no worries @gbwead, I never take your arguments personally, and thank you for kind words. I will reach out to community about it, while fixing standings in meantime. For now, waiting for more voices about it.
Oh poor Bear, he gave so much for the team tournaments that we have to let him spit in our face.
You know exactly what I meant when I said you weren't part of history, I mean you didn't win anything and therefore you have nothing to lose.
No one has questioned your involvement and all the work you have done for the community, yet your message is just a long irrelevant argument about it to defend you from erasing part of history.
Don't you understand that you created an irreparable mess, you stole prestige from teams and then gave it to teams who had never claimed it?
It has become impossible to fix this mistake without hurting someone now so don't blame us for showing up late because the damage is done.
What's happening now is that you keep pressing on the wound with this retroactive thing.
Many people believe what you did is unfair, they were not affected by this disaster and yet they stand up against your decision but you keep ignoring the facts and bring non-sense on the table.
What I am going to say you will be able to take it personally, I think you are very good in the organization and the management of events but you are disastrous when it comes to making decisions. Your formula is a joke, it punishes the winner of the tournament, it's the opposite of what was done before you came to destroy everything.
Pull yourself together man and heal yourself from this acute bad faith. -
39 minutes ago, CanadaSorry said:
History is always written by the winning side? :']
More like, history has been rewritten by someone who is not part of it.
Someone who woke up one day with the idea of the most absurd formula, he was so proud of his formula that he decided to use his power to reinvent a fabulous history disconnected from all reality.
Luckily his wacky idea only altered part of the story and only a minority of teams were harmed.
This idea is so absurd that it could have titled a team that never won anything, obviously that would have unleashed the crowds but the disastrous rankings resulting from its formula were overshadowed by the fact that one team completely dominated this period.
Other teams have been harmed but they no longer exist and are not there to protest against this abomination.
All that's left are us, weary veterans who fight the demon in vain. -
13 minutes ago, Bearminator said:
I'm sorry but I disagree. Calling a team A team of year XYZ then changing it due to changed suddenly criteria, which never was part of the official scoring for 2013-2018 era is unjust as well. Then we would have different criteria for 2019-2022, then different for 2023 - its just a mess that Im not willing to introduce.
That is exactly what you have done, you have corrupted history by designating new winners of your hat thanks to your subjective weighting disconnected from reality.
Not only is your system a joke that allows a team that hasn't won any TT to win the TT of the year, but it also sullies history and our memories. -
27 minutes ago, Bearminator said:
Even if counting 15 points instead of 10, RNG has 57 points to AW's 63. Can you please elaborate?
(still full check will happen ofc, just saving time there)
Also clarificiation:
Since previous years were counted with 10 points in mind, and the change happened only this year, I dont believe we should count 15 at all for previous years.
When a system allows a team that won no TT in a year to win the TT of the year, it shows how bad it is.
You may find it very cool to manipulate numbers and create a custom weighting, but maybe it's time to stop playing the data analyst and just give that title to the team that has won more TTs on the year and only consider the remainder when there is a tie. -
-
5 hours ago, queest said:
China will win again?
Not if Belgium signs up ?
- Thenavarro, Mkns1070 and smadagos
-
2
-
1
-
-
-
On 5/3/2022 at 10:17 PM, caioxlive13 said:
Night Shade doesn't do suppereffective damage. He only check immunitys, but ignores resistances and weakness. To hit shedinja, only 2 types of damage hit him: Supereffective damage and Residual Damage.
I make sure I'm right before I report.
You're the kind of person who talks a lot to say nothing, aren't you? -
On 4/30/2022 at 4:48 PM, Munya said:
Thank you for your report, this will be dealt with in the future.
Not defending our mistakes, but they do happen, and we rely to some extent on players like you reporting these things when they do occur. There are like 500 obtainable pokemon with hundreds of moves in their learnlists across multiple generations, its a very difficult thing for us to catch without your help and we appreciate that.
It's a pleasure to help, catching all the bugs/mistakes is for sure hard work, don't take my post as blame, I've just been surprised that such a thing went uncaught for so long.
By the way, there is another thing that can be fixed regarding Shedinja: it's immune to Night Shade while it shouldn't be the case.
-
On 12/8/2021 at 1:34 PM, OrangeManiac said:
I'm not sure are we supposed to also comment about overpowered sets but I think Shedinja with U-Turn is just absolute BS in randoms environment. If you don't have an entry hazard user, it's almost unbeatable. Whenever you go to your Pokemon that has a move on Shedinja, they're already gone.
And it goes without saying that he doesn't normally learn U-turn, strange mistake from the devs here...
-
38 minutes ago, clayclover said:
I respect Completely your opinion about don't get involved into this, i deleted in my comment the Lava reference... So you mean people here are just mad about this event because we posted this at forum?
Not especially because of the forums but because the event is public and open to all, in a way it competes with the official PSL and could even replace it in the long term, who knows ?
I personally have no problem with this event or the name but who cares about my opinion, what I said was in the name of lava, nothing personal.I wish good luck to everybody taking part in this event and especially to the hosts it's not an easy task.
- PoseidonWrath, clayclover and NagaX
-
3
-
8 hours ago, AwaXGoku said:
The problem I see with everyone calling their own tournament "PSL" is there will be less hype when the "regular" PSL will be create. Since it was something happening once a year or maybe twice was really exciting and bring a lot of hype in the pvp community. Now PSL from private team follow each other and then people dont take this name seriously.
On 3/6/2022 at 6:44 AM, clayclover said:PSL LAVA, PSL VGC, PSL PAST. So... what's the problem that LAB make his own PSL?
On 3/6/2022 at 8:45 AM, Imperial said:Regarding 'PSL Lab', there was Lava PSL, Past PSL and Zero PSL which all followed the same format like this one will, which is basically a league (regular season and then play offs). It's a terminology competitive players here understand and the hosts are not claiming the level is high as the original PSL.
On 3/6/2022 at 10:34 AM, Artemis4 said:I can understand your displeasure with the use of the term "PSL", however that term has been used several times by the community in the past (PSL Zero, PSL Pást, PSL Lava, etc), and I don't think there should be an exception for Lab when trying to make their own PSL format.
How Lava PSL, Lava League or whatever we want to call it can be compared to this ?
We are hosting a private competition that is purely reserved to lava members and is not public in any way.
What is reproached is the public use of the term "PSL", those arguments are therefor completely irrelevant, please leave us out of this.
- MathewMat, KaynineXL, Kamowanthere and 5 others
-
8
-
What would you guys think of the 2OUN format (2XOU or lower, 2XUU or lower, 2XNU or lower) ?
I used to host that format in my teams events, it always been fun and appreciated
- Poufilou, Quinn010 and PoseidonWrath
-
2
-
1
-
3 hours ago, RysPicz said:
FOR THE TRIPLE CITY
- DarylDixon, Xigbar, Endirei and 14 others
-
17
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
-
-
GG VVVV, you took your revenge brilliantly, best luck for finals !
Thanks to my lava fellows, you guys performed at the highest level, getting solid results every week against rough opponents, I'm proud to be with you all
Of course we were here to win it all but reaching semis in such a hard competition is still a great achievement for a team who was competitively nowhere close to this one year ago
Finally thanks to Mkns who is doing an amazing job despite all what I said
Vamos lava !
- pablobacas, Aerun, Mnemosyne and 20 others
-
23
-
-
-
-
6 hours ago, MknsZblex said:
Lo: 100% qualified
(top1 if win / top2 if tie / top3 if lose)
6 hours ago, MknsZblex said:Lava: Need to tie to be 100% in play off
(top1 if win OR if tie and HDLM win less than 9-1 / top2 if lose 2-6 and live win 6-2 or tie / top3 if lose and HDLM vs Live tie OR if lose 2-6 and Live win 7-3 or more OR if lose 3-7 and Live win OR if tie and HDLM win 9-1 or 10-0)
-
[WC 6] PokeMMO World Cup 6 - Player Registration Thread (August 20th, 2023 to September 2nd, 2023)
in Unofficial Events
Posted
Kriliin
Belgium