Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
  • IGN

Contact Methods

  • Discord

Recent Profile Visitors

4639 profile views
  1. Are you serious ? How dare you make such a fallacious shortcut ? Coaching is allowed in officials, having screenshots of SIA players admitting it is therefor totally irrelevant. I don't need to defend my integrity in PSL, all my PSL teammates will be able to testify how I kept the coaching far away from me for better and for worse. And since the 3 hosts of the last PSL were my teammates, their point of view about my integrity is clearly more concrete than an irrelevant screenshot. @Aerun I really hope you liked his post without reading it cause you're probably one of those who can attest how I never asked for coaching nor coached anyone. I always condemned coaching in PSL, I forbade my players to do it and I did everything to push them to train and get ready. Seriously bro'?
  2. I agree with you, the team I brought was too matchup reliant and therefore not good enough. Rain teams are something that we usually make fun of in SIA. But we used to play a lot against Aw players and they know most of our teambuilds, that's why we decided to try to surprise them with a rain team. It was known that Ferrothorn would be close to an auto-lose and I took the risk. They did exactly the same by bringin a rain team extremely weak to Magnezone which is something I run a lot, it could have gone in either ways. Since Aw players are dominating the competitive scene in many ways, it's literally like saying : if you are not better than the very best then you are bad. In addition to being false, it's an insult to everyone, even to Aw players who redoubles their efforts to perform that way. I would not have imagined that your arrogance could match your stupidity. Oh and btw, we beat Aw 3-0 in February's TT, 1-2 against them in 2019, damn, we're really soooo bad guys... You probably watched it with your ass since you haven't even seen me using Defog during my duel.
  3. Yeah, like I said earlier, I could even consider another line-up more accurate than mine. Sorry for my lack of precision, I tried my best though. Good night mate.
  4. I will not waste my time providing a justification for every single choice I made, I'm not the organizer in case you haven't realized. I already mentioned it at the bottom of page 1. I thought it was obvious that "joining date" meant "first appearances in the competitive scene" and not the "account creation date". Gunthug understood it that way though. My goal was to oppose performances >< appearances.
  5. The simple reason you didn't get it after so many explanations and even asked for it. It's simple, I estimate if the player performed more in the OG or in the NG according to the others.
  6. gbwead performed in both NG and OG, he could find his place in both line-ups just like LKrenz or Yubel for instance. I divided my line-ups the way I wanted, nobody prevented you to make yours, I could even consider another line-up more accurate than mine, stop acting like if I had imposed mine. Why bringing one more time the argument "he originally popped of in OG" and than asking "where did i sort people based on joining dates?" Players are sorted by performances in OG and NG, "being around for ages" or "popped of in OG" are therefore irrelevant.
  7. You don't get it or you don't want to get it ? It's pretty simple, OG means Old Gen, it doesn't mean old players. The OG line-up should be the players who performed well before november 2017. NG means New Gen, it doesn't mean new players. The NG line-up should be the players who performed well after november 2017. This is the only consistent way to divide the 2 line-ups, you even suggested Madara and Mkns in your NG line-up while those 2 players were already playing before november 2017. Takens already said it, the joining date has nothing to do with this event, it's all about OG and NG legendary players.
  8. What you are asking is "old players against new players" while this tournament is clearly about generations. Takens even said 16 legends of PokeMMO, there are no legendary new competitive players.
  9. I don't think so, I think performances are more relevant than the joining dates. Most of the players who are performing well in NG already played in OG. It means that the NG line-up would be ridiculously less interesting than the OG one to me and many players who are not going to find a place in the OG line-up would be players who performed more than the NG players in the NG itself. All in all, it will reduce the quality of the event. For instance, enchanteur who will probably not be in the OG line-up could not be a in NG line-up while we are probably all agreeing he's one if not the player who performed the most in the NG.
  10. Some of them were good in both OG and NG. I based my rankings on their performances during those gens, not on their joining dates.
  11. What do you mean ? NG starts in november 2017
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.