Jump to content

caioxlive13

Members
  • Posts

    2438
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by caioxlive13

  1. Quinn can only abuses match ping if you decline to duel. If you just accept, even if you lose, he doesn't get Match ping perms. Just accept, if you win you can also won some money from that.
  2. And this is not something exclusive from MMO metas. On Smogon's Gen 7 PU or ZU, i don't recall right now, Mesprit was a top mon. But all that taked to mesprit rise, was a player with plenty of time, to not say other things, spam it from day 1 to 31 on the highest tier. And the meta shifted a lot, Skuntank on that meta became irrelevant overnight. The problem is the same can be done there, just need like you said, 2 players with a full week avaliable, someone alone with a full month free, or you can call like 10 teammates to assist and move a lot of key mons up simultaneously.
  3. The idea is pretty straight forward, add an AG format onto the tier options on duel request. This format wouldn't force any ban or clasule by default. Since in the future we will have legendarys, some of them may be banned from Doubles, it can be an option to duel with them in tournament mode with friends, or in tours that doesn't enforce the ban or doesn't want to do that Immediatly, only on the following week.
  4. Man idc, i just want a more fair Tiering. I couldn't vote right now anyway. Gallade i'm on doubt if will be banned directly or by TC, or even reach 50% since there is literally almost an 50/50 about their ban. (if banned, plz remove S-Sword only, far more effective) but Dugtrio won't be discussed by TC with that suggestion, because it would reach the majority to ban directly. This suggestion i think it's necessary to sustain TC authority because since now we have complex bans instead of moveset changes, tournaments non-official are no longer forced to follow a ban and can play with custom rules. That can be applied if TC does something that community doesn't agree. For example, now if a tour thinks that banning Hydrei Draco was excessive, they can allow them under their clasules. Previously they couldn't because devs would hardly enforce the ban by removing draco meteor from Hydrei moveset. And on lower tiers, that is already happening with slam leading the train, banning Crawdaunt for UU duels and contesting TC decision on not banning it.
  5. It happened once and... Obviously it was fault of an Brazilian team, they catch the legendary Mewtwo and hided in Silph. Co. However, they not only farmed with the legend but also showcased it excessively on PT global at the point everyone was furious and trying at any cost to find them. People talked poorly about that team for 15 days. I forgiven them way longer, took 6 months or 1 year? Idk.
  6. If he appeals he may get his account back. He recognized his mistake already. If he doesn't get his account back, staff would prob still let him create another and continue playing if he wishes.
  7. I think TC should take part on votes only for deciding if a thing would be quick-banned or tiebreaker. Community should held most of the votes. "But we shouldn't let everyone vote since people with 0 knowledge will vote" apply criterias to join. Like, make 4 Suspect Testing tournaments and all who reach in semifinals at least once could vote. On Smogon, there is community vote and everything flows well. Just apply: 2/3 of the votes to ban = ban. 50% + 1 votes to ban or more, but not the 2/3 majority = Community is splitted and TC votes under current voting rules to tiebreak. <50% votes to ban = No ban.
  8. A plenty of rules doesn't make sense. Like the tie-break rules, imo the rule shouldn't exist on ladder, because there is cases where you down a pokemon can still win the duel, or tie. There is still 1v2 that you can win. Like you're vs a Crit-me-not mon and you had only suicune left while your opponent has the crit me not mon and something that gets neutralized to suicune, let's say a low health scizor. The opponent can stall until the time runs out and win. In theory, the suicune player is winning. That is so braindead that some tours doesn't enforce time limit, Grand Slam suggested to even let the match be judged by a Referee. For competitions that i may host in the future, i will apply the Slam rule for tie break and ignore the MMO's system result, and if the match is for a round-robin i'm willing to let the match tie. And before gbwead appears to say again that pokémon can't tie because it's not chess, i wasn't aware smogon was a Chess Community, i always though it was Pokémon. it's always who dies first that loses. On self-destruct and explosion cases, the attacker dies before the defender.
  9. He can no longer adapt. On those cases he is IP-banned so if he creates another account it will be banned in a short period of time. But he can still profit for that if he gets the info selling one thing more important: Knowledge. He can sell the info of how they detect to other RMT players and allow them to adapt.
  10. Read Edwardinho's post for more clarifications. And pay entry is Entry Fees? If yes, then it's fully allowed but remind that you can't charge real money or items outside of game, and you must refund everyone if you cancel your event. The fees really has no limit and you can also profit.
  11. Yea, but i lied about the vanity market. Now i analyze and it indeed impacted. But not decreasing the value, but rather increasing or in stale-mate. The alphas and candys quick-money allows money to be in multiple people's hands. There is more demand over them, since now more people can afford it and if devs makes vanitys harder to get, it will for sure rise. On Alpha Market and Breeding the offer is still higher than demand, and the offer rised more than demand for them, and this caused comp mons to lost value except Legends which increased(Offer stayed where it is since alphas won't breed with them, but demand increased with more people able to afford.)
  12. No i didn't attacked it, i just expressed my opinion that the tournament is elitist, and i can argue that because the host can invite 25 players(And was reduced to 25 to look less elitist, before was 29 reserved spots.) to take part without playing qualifications. Did you see Argentina qualify directly to the World Cup just because it has 3 World Cup titles? No. It still has to pass through qualifying process. Responding the second point, no, people wouldn't report because the first part was still on subject of the topic. So it's not entirely the post, just the last part which if a moderator sayed that was Off topic i would simply move to a spoiler and move on. And responding to the last line to keep on the topic and not allow people to call me a hypocrit due to not answer all the post, i hope it had a change on alpha's EXP candy system, to it be retransferred to Raids and scaled based on raid's difficulty(Higher raids = More and better candy), even to reduce the amount of Alphas on GTL because breeding nowadays is becoming so cheap that extract some profit is each day harder. Using what i sayed before, i could sell in a couple of minutes before an lvl100 chomp for 250k and even i could see someone putting it back on GTL for 300k. But nowadays, if i put the same chomp for 150k, i can wait days and it won't sell. What @MightyMicheleclaimed is false due to the reasons given by other posts, Alpha's candys doesn't impact the Vanity Market in nothing, but it impact on Breeding market because it promotes too much interess on alphas and makes Breeding low cost, consequently making the mons Breeded much more cheaper.
  13. +Nationality of the teams. Because you can use the nationality to find someone to play. But not language also to help on timezones(For example, Brazilian teams would be listed separatedly from Portugal Teams, so when you're playing and you're from Brazil, is more likely to have someone logged with you).
  14. Ik, i just tested people and i've proven a point i told before. You guys just search for things to blame me, because you ignored the whole rest of the post.
  15. If i had more credibility, the challenge league as we know today wouldn't exist. Instead, it would be done at same time with PSL and only with players not drafted to it. I had this idea before first edition of PCL.
  16. I indeed agree that this suggestion is elitist, Although they could remove the Exp candys from Alphas and put them as Raid Rewards, to increase their rarity and decrease interess on "Hey , this alpha is trash but i'm going to it just because candys" to reduce people catching it and increase a little the comps mons and pve mons value, that has decreased since Alphas(Decreased the multiple x31 costs, that was one of the most expensive things in breeds) and Account box(No need for multiple PvE mons on all characters, having one of each works.). The Alphas's EXP candys didn't affected in absolutely nothing the Vanity Market, but it affects negatively the Pokémon Market due to reasons above. Just to give an clear example before someone argues that it didn't do nothing: Garchomp before alphas and the Acc box was 300+k if lvl 100. After Alphas it decreased because it was significatively cheaper to breed one. With account box, it decreased more since who had extra ones now is selling the excedents. Now we can't sell a full trained lvl 100 chomp for more than 150k. On removing candys, alphas reduce their circulation a bit and it increases the breeding cost causing the mon to get value. However, i don't think you can complain about elitism because... Do i really need to explain why people that support and play elitist tours (OUVItational) can't complain about the elitism if it's a thing they literally does? You can argue the suggestion is wrong, i recognize it. You can argue that she is being selfish, it's okay. But elitism? That no, you aren't in the position to complain about that.
  17. problem is more the Burn. Because even if you had a Rock-type that resist the Sacred Fire, Rhyperior, you prob think: "Ain't risking a burn." and switch out. Same thing as Scald in other mons, even you having the type advantage the secondary effect makes you think if it's worthy to stay or not in the field. And just fire types won't be annoyed by a burn and can stay.
  18. Poli was NU/Untiered back on July 2021 and it rised later because of rise of 3 mons he luckily happens to check. Feraligatr, Crawdaunt and Entei. Guess what? All 3 were considered banworthy, but then came the next on the list and overtaked it.
  19. Although i know we need more people on our language moderating, talking in Behalf of the Portuguese-speakers, English requirment is important for an CM. Let's say you need to mute "JoaozinhoGameplays" for bad behavior. An CM cannot mute so he has to pass the case for a Higher moderator and those high moderators are English-speakers. Unless we have a Real-time translation mod, like QSMP's one, both cannot communicate beetween themselves. And no, we cannot make a new player who register for CM already be some mod with power to Mute or Ban, he has to gain knowledge and experience first to be trusted enough to have that power. But yea, we need something. Like i commented in other thread, we from PT chat have only one moderator and he is from Portugal while 95% of the Chat are basically from Brazil. So after 20:00 UTC -3, there is 0 moderators able to communicate in portuguese avaliable to assist us. And no, i'm not including Teddi there because... SGM. Has high-level task and not always will be avaliable on the chat. So, for us, we have two options when someone breaks rules: Report him, which takes at least 2-3 days to answer, or pray we had someone able to communicate in English and warn some moderator on Global EN of what's happening on PT Global chat.
  20. That isn't RMT... Oh i get it, you buy RP and then sell on GTL. If this way, then yea, there is a legit way to buy Pokédollars, not directly but indirectly
  21. I've done something even bigger. I've beaten all the regions with just the mons i gain on storyline. Other mons? They're just HM slaves and nothing else.
  22. It changed on the Changelog 11/05/2021. But as a counterbalance measure, Frisk no longer reveals which mon in a horde has a item, just that some mon has a item.
  23. That is a good relief, at least i won't see someone carrying a Unfezant on higher raids.
  24. I don't believe mods does a bad job but they could do that for some chats like PT, that after certain time(In our case, 19:30 BRT) there is no moderator avaliable(On PT chat, happens because the only moderator there is Deusbruno and he is from Portugal, so 19:30 for us is 22:30 for him, and he is a human before everything so he must have his good sleep night like every1 else.)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.