Jump to content

Kizhaz

Members
  • Posts

    3888
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Everything posted by Kizhaz

  1. I would say this is a good temp solution (tbh I thought we already did this) but not a bad suggestion. I love me some organization
  2. This is intended, the item must be used for Unburdan to activate
  3. You'll have to forgive me because I don't speak Spanish all that well (or at all), but if my translation is correct you're complaining about not being rewarded for reporting players? Player reports exists solely to help those that have been wronged and catch people that are breaking the games rules that have otherwise been missed by the staff team. Offering rewards for this is not something we're looking to add. If Google translate is lying to me and this is not what you're asking then feel free to shoot me a pm and I'll try to answer you as best I can.
  4. You need to talk to the person inside the Pokemon Center, he will let you travel back
  5. Ah that's mb, I thought we were talking shiny + shiny.
  6. It would only lose OT if the mother is not your OT. This makes it so you have to actually catch the pokemon to claim it in the OT dex. Also prevents trash ot shiny pokemon being turned into rare ones
  7. There is a Plasma Grunt inside the PC that will take you back to N's castle
  8. Please make a post in our support section and we should be able to help you out.
  9. Please make an appeal here https://forums.pokemmo.eu/index.php?/forum/37-ban-appeal/
  10. The ability didn't exist until gen 6 is what they mean
  11. Please make a post here to file a player report https://forums.pokemmo.eu/index.php?/forum/28-player-reports/
  12. Assuming this was made to show off that you obtained Mewtwo it should be posted here
  13. They would also go in unnoficial events section
  14. Technically you aren't wrong, each encounter should be treated as your first since the rate is always 1/30000. However if you then look back at your previous encounters (say 30000 of them) and you've yet to seen a shiny, it's a 36.7% chance to have managed that which is where this fallacy that it was a 63.2% chance of getting a shiny by then comes from. At the end of the day none of this really matters since you could find one after 5 encounters or 5 million E. I guess on an easier level to look at it, Focus Blast will hit 70% of the time therefor it will miss 30%. If after 8 Focus Blasts the chance of missing just 1 of them is 94.2% but this isn't to say that there was a 5.8% to hit every one because each turn was independent of the previous ie. Missing Turn 2 doesn't make it easier to hit Turn 3. The first half of this thread had a good in depth look at this sort of thing (not sure if trashed threads can even be viewed)
  15. Actually mathematically that is how probability works, it's an exponential curve that never quite reaches 100%
  16. Yeah it still happens, but it's less than how many would do it if it was allowed. In this sort of competition less is better so that the auction and the whole team aspect actually means something
  17. tytyty, we made a nice colony
  18. I don't know why but this has been the most herculean task for me all week. I'm after a group of people with the Bee costume vanity to pose in Castelia Gym for a screenshot with a Beedrill/Combee/Vespiquen follower, so if anyone here would like to help me out that would be great ty \o/
  19. If no rules have been violated then the account will not be punished. If the account is mistakenly punished for one reason or another you may submit a ban appeal and have things sorted out there
  20. They offered a few seasons ago when the game had a much smaller playerbase, it's not quite fair to assume they would be fine to do so again without first asking them (Unless somebody already has then I retract this statement) Apologies I wasn't aware this was quoted from an SGM, as far as I was aware the main reason is the point I've stated numerous times with "players can accuse staff of cheating" as a follow up. I don't believe I've ever heard of a staff member manipulating a tournament nor having the possibility to do so, which is why I find this reason to be strange. Who and when was this quoted from because I feel it's moot? I just feel that enforcing a rule for a minority that was never an issue in the first place isn't the action to take. I'm also selfish because I don't want to have to get onto an alt just to play or even spectate a battle. Often times I'll still be doing staff duties whilst spectating so this would prevent me from doing so. We already can't participate in Officials making Unofficial the only place we can and personally I'd rather not have that taken away and if anyone truly doesn't trust us then perhaps we're not doing our job correctly.
  21. I think this is a tad extreme, especially for something that hasn't been a problem in the past "If it aint broke don't fix it". Also SGM's currently are swamped with work so forcing them to prevent cheating in an unofficial would be unfair to them. Whilst what Fred said may be a factor it's not the main reason. A staff member taking part in an official takes a spot away from another player and as staff members we're here to make the game more enjoyable for everyone so participating goes against this. As for the trust issues, from what I'm reading if everyone trusted GM+ not to cheat this wouldn't be an issue, so technically trust is the issue. No I don't have proof I didn't cheat in past seasons unless you count the few battles I recorded last season, likewise there's no proof I did cheat so it shouldn't be used against me (which seems to be the entire premise of this discussion - only it's about all GM's)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.