Huargensy

Now that they mention about changing the mechanics of raising and lowering the tier, I think it is a good idea to lower or raise pokes depending on the average of use in the 3 months, I said it because some can raise or lower the use in the Final month as happened with ambipom, which had a use of 3/4% and in the final month it rose to 5%, and it stayed in uu like 1 year, I feel that it would be the best, I say if they have 3 months to lower the correct thing It would be to see the total use in those 3 months, for example if x mon had 3 4 and 5% in the 3 months on average it would have 4% and it would imply a decrease although in the last month it has enough use

You are wrong, the physical set of blaziken is totally viable in UU, his double stab hits the entire level except for tentacruel, which is of low use, while he can pivot with u-turn which other fighting types of the level cannot, cb can function as a wall break, and in the absence of fights since scrafty is mediocre and heracross left UU it turns out not to be a bad option, not to mention that, unlike medicham this has to respond to spiritomb, I am not surprised that it goes up to UU, but I agree that it should correct the system of raising and lowering levels with the current problem of the ranks

they exceeded with the deadline

Why not?

Ign: Huargensy Tiers: All. Discord: Alex's # 8791 Fluff: I'm a good person

I donated just to see the counter in zeros

Not is competitive

It is not the same something to choose that can imply not even playing the level to something that is mandatory, it is something that has been played in these events, and many of those who sign up play it, in addition to Why not place it?

Yes, that seems better to me in my opinion

Petition to withdraw an OU and place LC, 3 OU is too much for me and it would be better to be able to choose it as a choice manager, here there should be no complaints how in the toilet saying "My team does not have a Lc player" it is supposed to be a good event level, managers are qualified to pick a lc for their team

XD

At the moment of being picked you learn a lot from your team members, whether you play or not you will get some exp

XD

Because it's not worth playing outside of tournaments

Totally agree, I have been asking for these things to be banned for months, acupressure is rare to see, I would not take it as a problem but it would be better if it is eliminated, it is not relevant anyway. Psdt: Now caioxlive comes to say that they help defeat the stall

Lf lc

?

Ss OU is trash, ty

I do not think that deleting something so that a broken thing remains is a good idea, lucario is a problem, it may or it does not continue to be, also pory2 is not just an option for the boost of this, choice users locked, and predict of changes are, walls like umbreon are also, so should we remove all that so that it has no chance to boost? Lucario has no justification On the other hand, you are claiming that each person has different opinions about pory2 and it drives you crazy, so why don't we do a vote count of players with experience? So I think the divided opinions could be solved,

If you eliminate one you eliminate both, in tournaments prizes are played and it is a problem to play with friends of the rival insulting you or saying stupid things

It is very double moral to prohibit chats in rank but not in tournaments

It's been a few weeks and we've only seen one opinion from JJ, where are the others? I am not the only one to whom it must seem that the level is unplayable, Lucario sweeps with the specific set to many things of the level, and even without boosting it is capable of generating problems, I see rounds being won only with a boost of this and others where they both depend on him to win. We have to wait 3 months playing a level where Lucario breaks it and we must always focus on most of the builds? Or where should we counteract one luca boost against another to see which priority is better? They were responsible for this, at least say if they already made a decision and not wait weeks on something that should have been quickban.

The developers live in a fantasy world believing that a warning will solve the flinch, but hey, understandable they don't even bother to read us and even less do they know how frustrating it is to see and lose duels due to this item that does not contribute anything competitively

And that's the solution they provided, it's completely the stupidest thing they could do, I still think TC could ban this item from pvp although I'm not sure about that.

We have been complaining about that for months, but unfortunately we cannot blame TC for this, it is the fault of the developers who believe that placing a warning notice solves the flinch and unfair victories that this item offers