Jump to content

Paul

Members
  • Content Count

    156
  • Joined

  • Last visited

2 Followers

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • IGN
    Paul

Contact Methods

  • Discord
    varietypaul#3063

Recent Profile Visitors

1646 profile views
  1. The fact that this thread is 30 days old with no official response is quite ironic
  2. I'd sacrifice kyu for an event
  3. Paul

    JHOTO

    SI SI JOTHO NOW
  4. Nothing better than events at 3 o'clock in the morning!
  5. There's no way I'm the only one who thinks this is reasonable though right? (Assuming your math is all accurate) PvE players are OK with spending 8 hours grinding gyms & farming berries, but when you ask them to PvP for an hour, now we're going too far? Going off of your math, a 50% winrate would still only be around an hour & a half per day, which in no way is unreasonable to ask of. A common argument used is that some people don't have the time to play for an hour every day, OK. I don't have the time to grind RS anymore, so should I just get all the skill capes because I... want them? What about WoW mounts people have grinded years for, should they hand them to me because I think they look cool but don't have time to grind bosses? Personally I'm fine either way they go with this, but I'd just like to retain the rarity & value of these items, especially considering (imo) they don't look that great, so there's no point going for them otherwise.
  6. You don't have to be the best to earn the reward, you can still earn it, just not at the same pace as the #1 player. How is this not fair to you? You have 3 months per season to earn it, not sure why you're trying to do it in 4-5 days as you said earlier. As I mentioned in the other thread, I see this as a big problem. I'm not on the leaderboard so I can't test it myself, but the purpose of this update would be meaningless if you are still only getting 2 points
  7. Paul

    Seriously?

    Yeah that's definitely an issue. I'm hoping this isn't how it was intended, but if so, further changes will definitely need to be looked into. I assumed when it said points scale depending on elo, that would mean the #2 player would earn, let's say, 5 points per win compared to the usual 2.
  8. Maybe this is harsh, and not a direct attack at you, but you should not have a 157/155 win/loss record and expect to get the same reward as the #1 OU player. Sure, you have to grind more or improve at PvP, but you still have the ability to earn the same rewards, just at a slower pace.
  9. Paul

    Seriously?

    How many points are you earning for wins? I thought they scaled depending on elo and last time I checked you were #2 in UU, it shouldn't take 625 wins
  10. This is a change that promotes people to put in effort and increase their elo, rather than continue to grind low-ladder without trying to get any better. I think it'll hurt casual players who want the rewards, but will be good in the long run for 'forcing' these casual players to actually try. Casual players essentially have 3 options now 1. Get better 2. Continue to grind low-ladder with slower progress towards the reward 3. Give up Obviously #3 is not ideal, but I think this is quite fair considering these are PvP rewards for PvP players. This system is not complete and they will continue to tweak the requirements/payouts so it's best to just give it some time to test before asking for change.
  11. Paul

    Seriously?

    They changed how many points you earn based on your elo, so I assume they had to scale the requirements so the good players don't get all the rewards in 2 days of playing.
  12. I am shinyhunterjoe
  13. shinyhunterjoe has a negative win/loss record but will get the super special reward in 2 weeks
  14. I'm desperate for the hats to have some sort of value, and I fear shinyhunterjoe bringing sceptile to low ladder & eventually winning 250 games will hurt that
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.