Poufilou

This got old real quick

Actually decent suggestion. I think it's doable fairly easily too. But the problem is that if you imagine a button there is only 1 preset of data it takes to the GTL search (for example IV, nature, Pokémon egg group) but during price checking you often need to see the 2 different egg group of the Pokémon if it has 2, the species itself if it is rare/has important egg move pass etc. What I mean is if you want to implement this, maybe we can have the option to choose some preselect searching we make, choosing which data we want to see, and then apply it to the mon selected and it takes the data from it. There are many little QoL improvements that can be made in GTL like these. For example registering a search you often make. Minimizing GTL to keep the search while having your screen free. The customisation doesn't feel like a priority for them unfortunately, even though the demand is high, not only regarding GTL but also other UI tools (having preselect vanities combinations too for example). Not their strong side.

Make Special Candy non-necessary for Easy mode so everyone can test random stuff as they please even noobs without spending too many resources. Find another way to obtain Special Candy (remove miniboss) and buff kids. I disagree with gb's idea for easy mode. Keep bag reward if kids are buffed so you have 2 ways to get them that are more or less equal. Cookie prizes can be an idea to buff kids alongside changing atrocious 5:1 ratio or removing completely the trade thing and give beating up kids a different reward system.

Very nice, I hope patrouski will make a video about your video so I can watch that one instead.

Imo RNG is fine if you can react to it, RNG should be something that makes it harder because you have to react to it. This year everything has been nerfed so hard that it removes autonomy from player to react to RNG.

Thank you for reaching out, and it's great to hear from you! It's completely normal to have concerns and uncertainties when tackling a new challenge, especially when it involves working with the Pumpking boss. Rest assured, your concerns are valid, and it's a crucial step in the process of developing effective strategies. We appreciate your optimism in hoping that the administrators will consider these concerns. Open communication and feedback are key to addressing any resource challenges. Let's keep the lines of communication open and work together to find the best solutions. Enjoy the journey of overcoming these challenges, and don't hesitate to reach out if you have any further thoughts or ideas to share. We're all in this together! Best regards, Poufilou

Let us jump on flaming bike in Hoenn

Forum posts are one thing, ban appeals are another. Anything you post here only helps other players (in the best of cases), it doesn't help you nor does it help devs. That's all I'm saying. If you want to be some kind of savior, just try using the tools existing to make everything be better for everyone instead of antagonising devs. That is for sure my friend and I hope they will fix it soon. When they realise that too many apps/phone system tamper with client maybe they will try to fix it instead of telling people to uninstall them. For some players it's their phone itself so no wonder your reset didn't work.

Interesting theory, you must certainly know a lot about what devs are doing from your use of forum space. If you think people complaining on forums triggered devs making action then you don't know much about them. Lmao

But... they are redirecting to something, the support system. That's where you need to communicate your issues. Not the forums. If you do nothing else than complain on forums of course they will do nothing. You need to actually use the appropriate place.

You are right comrade, not only all pokemons are equal and deserve equal rights, but we should also eat the rich as they only abuse their privilege and wealth to find rare shinies. If devs don't react to these demands we will seize the means of programming and make every encounter a x10 horde.

The copy paste thing is from staff, which are not qualified to give people an answer about what could possibly be going on, they just direct to those who can, in the appropriate place (not general forums). Usually they answer your issue personally through support ticket once it is resolved. If you do not communicate your issue they will never look at it. No one in their right mind will agree that they are good with communication but here it's just that players also need to help in the effort, which seem OK to manage, touching grass for a day or two never hurts.

Well thanks to you they know one more thing that their system wrongly flags, hope it helps other players in your case getting unbanned and that they improve the system in future update. What did it cost, 2 or 3 days of you not being able to play on your phone ? I understand the frustration at other players insinuating stuff but it doesn't seem a reason to me to blame it on the devs work.

Seems unfair to say that if the support indeed resolved your issue, that's what its there for no ? It seems to me that staff got instructed to lead all players to the support feedback to resolve individual cases where devs look at what's happening. What else do you want from them ? There's no perfect auto-detection system anyways that's why support exists.

I always wonder what comes through the head of cheating people when they publicly make a fool of themselves like that. Why does this happen so often why can't they just stop at first warning keep playing and call it a day lmao

Devs making a u-turn on their past design decisions with no communication about it is pretty upsetting imo no matter if you like the new odds or not.

Gotta love the hypocrisy of changing your own 4y old+ feature under "bug fixes".

I forgot to re-mention it but this works because of another proposition concerning final scoring of teams which would prioritise first the amount of mandatory donators and secondly the donation amount. Which results in the more a team has money and has chance to qualify = the more players from its country there are.

Before the competition started, I had offered some rules on the general thread (around page 6) that would reinforce the "spirit" of world cup by limiting the capacity of players joining the team they want without repercussions for said team. Now that it ended, do you think it would have been a good thing ? One of the solutions I had for limiting foreign players was putting a cap limit of players per team (I see that you suggest one now for a different reason). The cap prevents from putting too many foreign members as they need a good % of mandatory donators to be qualified. Another thing I had in mind to make sure it is relevant (if player cap would end up too big for that to matter) is putting a donation amount cap per player. But this donation cap would be flexible, to not limit actual donation. For example, if the cap is 3M per mandator, that player can send 4M, and the extra 1M will only be relevant in case of tie between 2 teams with same amount of donators, but will only count as 3M for the total count. What do you think about these propositions now, considering one of the main issues of this year's WC was the lack of feeling like a country vs country competition ? I personally liked the idea of players joining foreign cos many players often don't find other ppl from their country, but it should have been more limited option in my opinion instead of being free for all with 0 consequences. Just to be clear, WC police of this year did not have any power of decision over this specific case, we were just here to make rules against cheating and stuff. This was for host/staff to be there. Imo we should just merge police and staff next time cos we just lack enough people and its too hard on host to do it all alone (we can thank gb for big job he did but it would be preferable to have actual competent and active co hosts).

IGN : Poufilou Tiers : Loser's game, randoms, catch/battle Discord: poufilou

Maybe you added more than 4 egg moves and it override the ones you learned first. If that is the case, Marill should be able to learn Perish Song using an heart scale. You can see all egg moves it can re-learn if you hover your mouse in the egg on the pokemon summary.

Wow, I never thought of that. I don't think anyone reading my message would have had this deduction. You are very smart and your comments are always helpful.

The automated leveling balance does not work for "original" forms of Rotom and Wormadam ; despite being lowest every month, they actually lose level instead of gaining it, while the other forms, in the upper part, do not change level and stay consistently strong / actually gained level somehow despite being at the highest. Randoms has become pretty boring for a while now, since there is no novelty in that format, despite new HAs, despite new moves, despite some mons that can clearly have better sets. If you guys don't want to make efforts into that format, then remove its slot to give it to a better one like LC. Or make Randoms a limited event-thing with special prizes idk.

Preparing mons to get particles on can be good too.