iJulian

jajaja, I mean, shame.

Dreico won.

Dreico vs XondeX in 10 (LC)

POV as promissed.

I won.

bump

^ Taking multiple bets up to 1m each and 2.5m total: - 250k @kiwi -100k @XondeX -300k @aZaz07 -1m @Zigh ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other bets (250k each unles specified otherwise): Rest of Asia 0 - 0 Argentina A OU - xMikasaAckerman VS LKrenz NU - SweetForU VS Souu Belgium 0 - 0 China A LC - Stelian VS Ahpool Doubles - iMat VS bfu SMOU - LLLLiolae VS Starmind (Up to 1m) Mexico 0 - 0 Peru B UU - KokenoCastro VS zAnderson NU - MexiDany VS ZDFire LC - Baneadito VS Hernjet @aZaz07 Doubles - Crisscy VS AngelosRed SMOU - CamiiNeko VS Hungarensy Spain 0 - 0 Columbia A OU - Kiwkidd VS Brianattackpro @kiwi UU - Killuminatis VS Enchanteur @kiwi NU - Busso VS JamesFaul @kiwi LC - XondeX VS Dreico @kiwi SMOU - Jorgefirebolt VS Zeldris

HYPE

COLOMBIA V. SPAIN HYPE @Zigh I'll see you in dubs bro don't you dare to put Busso instead....

But mago made the challonge and the challonge says points > h2h... Also, Im pretty certain the currents host have already confirmed it. (Plus, they announced that colombia and mexico classified to playoffs which wouldnt be the case if points wasnt the criteria used)

No, goal diff takes into account all matches.

It does go first.

But points (goal) diff goes before h2h in the soccer's worldcup too..

That's the challonge's order (score > points diff > tb)

Hey bro we were sweating (before the week started we tought we didnt need to win a single game, turns out we did...) plus, as much as it pains me, I'd say mexico deserved the win. we'll get them next round. The match wouldnt have even mattered if it wasnt for the Jorel desicion that led to mago quitting so if you see it from that perspective, nothing changed. Funny thing is, I'm better friends with some of the guys in your team than with mexico (I love pose and DH) so I wouldve rather have you guys go through instead of them but oh well. on a side note, my lineup wasnt really troll, I actually thought brian played uu and I was looking for alternatives in that tier (we're actually like 1-5 in it lmao whilisht we were undefeated in smou and dubs)

lmao James's been only the whole time and asked you to wait a bit to get a move into a pokemon, get online and qq

Also you want to run quiet cofag, with np so its defo not setup bait

Honestly, I would never use any of the pokemon that are being currently discussed (except maybe ape but it would require a very specific teambuild) and I use a lot of things, many of which are kinda niche so that should tell you something (anything abobe C would be crazy talk) The main drawback of zone is that it competes with every rotom form and yeah it can trap steels but thats not even that great in our metagame (ferro is rarer every time and you wont be 0koing meta), most of the time you'd be better running rotom + literally any fire type that fits your team (of which there are a lot of great ones) and even then, w-o-w on sciz/met might aswell be a ko so no trapping needed either. Mamo is okay rn I guess, I've only really ever ran it on a paraflinch discharge team and that was before garchomp. It will definitelly serve a better niche next patch once oblivious ignores intimidate.

Honestly, I hadnt really thought about it from that perspective but yeah, that would probably just make me spam the same team for the first few rounds and queue immediately after my previous match is done.

Not yet, eventually...

I mean they might aswell right? if what they wanna accomplish is being up to date it wouldnt make sense for them not to update it so they are outdated again after a couple months

you are in a horde battle which applies spread damage instead of single target. click "doubles" on the calc for the correct rolls

Why would you purposely want to prevent the use of any one strategy?? Also what about lvl 49? It's a tradeoff of some stats (damage and bulk) for trick room mons to be slower than their counterparts

Thank you! the topic can be closed now