-
Posts
107 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Posts posted by urquidi
-
-
-
1 hour ago, SiWall said:
IGN : Sin Muro
2 cr jugador
the most expensive player
- jorgemaximo and SiWall
- 1
- 1
-
-
1 hour ago, SquirrelMix said:
Take alejovish, yaritan, megabladers, and Colombia win
-
10 minutes ago, Belegado said:
NU1: JereSteve vs Cogeid 100k
UU1: Shelluny vs DeusBruno 100k
UU2: Sickloonerr vs Razimove 100k
NU1: Mexidany vs xJoseee 200k
UU1: Snowot vs Jaoally 100k
UU2: Méndez vs Loduc 100k
NU1: XueRuo vs Ayodes 100k
OU1: CaptnBaklava frente a Fibraxxxx 100k
UU1: RexB contra zAnderson 200k
OU2: Endiii vs Elvessss 1m
Estados Unidos vs Filipinas AdoBoiz
UU1: xSparkie vs RareBush 100k
Resto de Asia vs Resto de Europa
UU2: Spxter vs Incognition 100k
Take Meendez, xSparkie and incognition
-
-
Me vs QueenDinz in 10 min
-
Ign: sadesh
Country: Bolivia
Tiers: NU, OU, UU
I register it because it does not have an account in the forum and is too lazy to create one
- jorgemaximo, EfronX, JorgeFirebolt and 5 others
- 8
-
-
In ign: urquidi
-
Me vs ErosG en 10
-
5 hours ago, xMago said:
Imagine que el personal elimina LC TIER para enviar duelo también
you just level the battle level to lvl 5 and problem solved
-
8 minutes ago, CristiDOX said:
they want to ride me that's shady
-
-
Me vs MadaraSixSix in 10
-
18 minutes ago, Desu said:
Leíste mi respuesta? Las apelaciones de prohibición no son un lugar para argumentar su inocencia, son un lugar para supervisar y revisar las prohibiciones y para que podamos preguntar sobre las acciones específicas tomadas.
Puedo asegurarles que revisamos la evidencia en cada apelación.
I understand this point but I really do not understand then the name of the appeal if the innocence of a banned player is not allowed to be proven, then what actions should be taken to prove such innocence? I also think that at least the players should at least have the proof of what we did and not just answers like "we know he did it" or "we know he is guilty" without giving any proof or opportunity to give any that proves innocence then maybe also think about it and how to improve it since each player deserves the opportunity to defend themselves
- TheBloo, redbluegreen, GaloL48 and 13 others
- 16
-
Hace 14 horas, Zymogen dijo:
Me gusta la idea de estar encerrado en un número X de equipos por torneo, es un concepto interesante. Pero no creo que hacer que los torneos sean más "justos" para los jugadores más nuevos sea la razón correcta para hacer este cambio.
Este es un MMO, un juego que se basa principalmente en la agricultura de objetos y dinero. Ser el chico nuevo con menos recursos es parte integral de la experiencia MMO, y solo tiene sentido que la vieja guardia sea recompensada con la ventaja, por el tiempo que han dedicado a acumular sus colecciones y equipos. Este es un juego competitivo, no una fiesta de lástima
exactly that is what we should think, this is a mmo there is no reason to give more advantage to new players without resources who have or would have to do everything possible to advance and thus reach the top of the competitive game, if we wanted that because not only go to compete at showdown where you do not need resources to have the teams you want, who here did not sacrifice days and days of games and farming to be able to build their teams I do not understand why we should be harmed or is it that we are people who want play wow starting at lvl 100 and with a lot of money?
-
17 minutes ago, CHUCKunso said:
Está bien, ya veo, no sabía eso, pero ¿por qué su nombre es diferente en esta semana de repente? Lmao
Like he wanted to give us a reason to bully him and he got that name so ugly, he made it happen like he just wanted to change the h of his name to a capital h which took a couple of weeks
-
2 hours ago, Poufilou said:
La construcción de contraataques es emocionante porque es una apuesta, porque tu oponente puede hacerlo también o cambiar de equipo. Por lo tanto, se requiere conocimiento de habilidades para contrarrestar y conocimiento de habilidades para hacer que el equipo sea bueno incluso contra otro equipo al que deseaba contrarrestar. Puedo entender por qué es divertido, pero no entiendo lo que requiere más habilidad. Es el mismo juego. Solo te preparas diferente
Pero estoy de acuerdo en que el azar es más justo. Quizás menos divertido si la gente disfrutara contraatacar. Aunque en algún momento todos los jugadores en las últimas rondas del torneo se conocen entre sí y solo a ambos contrarreloj. Como dijo Pachima, es cuestión de quién tuvo más suerte en el juego de adivinanzas. Eso no es realmente una habilidad.
The ability goes in the fact of having known how to put together a good team that of one against the old rival and also efficiently covers a possible change of pokemon that the rival may have since if we talk about luck in a riddle we have to also talk that with Random keys can be played by an opponent who is also stronger or against yours and it would not be based on skill either
-
really if we talk about ability for this tournaments it seems to me that much more skill is needed putting together different teams for the tournaments and having to be able to play for each different rival that comes to touch than spam a single team that even in their majority reach be the same in a lot of players as in the case of teams that carry a climate or others that are used in the same way by a lot of players while if the keys of the tournaments return to what should not have changed more is needed ability to know how to play an opponent who may or may not repeat the same team between rounds since when changing teams both only know their way of playing and based on that it is a more equal fight than it is at the moment
-
Me vs Mlhawk in 10 if you connect to the game
-
Playing vs pirlo after cristian vs jj
-
Me vs YeyoXD after Pablobacas vs krillin
-
Me vs baneadito after madara vs Imat
LCPL 2.0 Betting Thread
in Unofficial Events Archive
Posted
Take